Proskauer Rose Involved in Fraud on the US Patent Office? Is Proskauer Rose Joseph Leccese Really Looking into the iViewit Case?

"MPEG - Proskauer Rose LLP Stealing Inventions - A fraud on the United States Patent and Trademark Office by Eliot I. Bernstein on Sunday, January 22nd, 2006 @ 09:21PM www.iviewit.tvMy name is Eliot Bernstein and I am one of the inventors of the Iviewit inventions.

Many of the quotes here are from me and the proof for many of these claims can be found at the www.iviewit.tv website. Simply go to left navigation bar and click on the Supreme Court button and then click on either Appendix C or Exhibit Gallery.

Although voluminous in size, the exhibits are chalk full of evidence and information regarding the ongoing investigations. Also, much can be learned at the Iviewit blog at http://patentgate.blogspot.com .

In response to this post, Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer Rose LLPtook invention disclosures from Iviewit inventors and patented those concepts into their management referral, Brian Utley's name. Rubenstein also contracted Raymond Joao at the law firm Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel to file the applications, while Rubenstein and Proskauer handled all of the other intellectual property work, including Rubenstein acting as a board member and opining to many investors on the inventions.

Joao worked at the law firm that Kenneth Rubenstein was at immediately prior to his learning of theIviewit inventions, MLGWS and then after learning of the inventions,Rubenstein instantly jumped to Proskauer, a firm that had no other intellectual property department to speak of and had been a real estate firm since the 1800's.

Proskauer Rose had already been retained and began work for Iviewit prior to Rubenstein leaving Meltzer. In fact, Kenneth Rubenstein and Joao were initially represented as Proskauer attorneys, although they were still at Meltzer. Joao filed patents into his own name while retained by Iviewit to file patents as Rubenstein’s lackey. Joao’s patents contained many of the ideas he and Kenneth Rubenstein learned from the Iviewit inventors, the disclosures and business plans of Iviewit. 

It is absurd to think that a patent attorney could file any patents in his name without a thorough conflict waiver from all clients and approval from the patent bar. History has never had a case where the patent attorney ran out and filed a blizzard of patents all crossing into his clients patent applications. Joao was also part of an elaborate scheme to move the patents out ofIviewit and into companies that Proskauer set up that had similar and identical names to the Iviewit companies.

Yet, the shareholder of those companies appears to be Proskauer Rose and others, not the true Iviewit shareholders or inventors.

Iviewit shareholders, including the SBA were totally unaware that these similar companies had been set up and unawarethat that similar patents were being filed into these companies with the false inventor BrianUtley, false owners and assignees.

Joao was discovered patenting ideas into his name and other dubious behavior and he was fired for his actions. Proskauer and Utley referred William Dick of Foley and Lardner to replace Joao, Utley stated that Dick was the IBM Far East patent attorney and his very close personal friend. 

The original Proskauer attorney, Christopher Clarke Wheeler, Esq.(recently arrested in Del Ray Beach, FL for DUI with bodily injury) failed to disclose that he, Utley and Dick were involved in intellectual property crimes from Utley's former employ, Diamond Turf Equipment owned by Monte Freidkin of Boca Raton.

Friedkin discovered that patents were walking out the door to Utley's sole (souless) name and fired him. It was not learned until Wheeler andUtley's deposition and Dick's response to the Virginia Bar that the three of them had been involved in the crime.

Wheeler set up the company, Dick wrote the patents from Utley's employer secretly into Utley's name at home and Utley got in and stole the inventions from his employer.

This is the same type of scam that they instituted on Iviewit and again appear to be failing achieving their ends. Dick was Joao's replacement and since it was never disclosed by any of them, the fact of their prior past patent theft attempt, Iviewit was dumbfounded to find this prior history out after learning they were stealing Iviewit inventions.

Moreover, Wheeler and Proskauer submitted a resume on Utley that claimed that Diamond Turf went on to be a huge success do to Utley's inventions, when the truth was that the company was instantly closed by Friedkin after he found Utley stealing from his company while acting as the President of Friedkin’s company.

Utley failed to disclose this, Wheeler and Proskauer never disclosed this when Iviewit retained them and Dick and Foley failed to inform us of Dick's past with this group.

This is a criminal organization of patent thieves, they have a history and they are a danger to inventors, good lawyers everywhere and the United States and foreign countries patent systems.

I am not against patent attorneys filing patents as long as there is a hefty review by the patent department or the USTPO OED, to investigate if those attorney inventions lay claim on any client inventions they may have represented or as in our case misrepresented.

It is very dangerous for patent attorneys to be patenting inventions for themselves while representing client interests, and the obvious collusion amongst patent attorneys to work together to steal each others clients inventions remains a gaping hole.

Yet these guys filed false oaths on applications in others names for inventions they learned while retained by the Iviewit inventors,no excuse can be had for this, this is plain theft, fraud on the patent office, fraud on the Iviewit inventors, the Iviewit shareholders and all the EPO foreign offices and the history of the world and invention.

This is not even close to a patent attorney having a novel idea (although that seems far fetched as attorneys are not typically inventive) and then patenting it in his name with no client involved. Joao has stated that some of his inventions were prior to ours and that Iviewit was in fact infringing on his inventions (he claimed this to the New York Supreme CourtAppellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee), yet Joao failed to seek waivers or disclose this in writing or verbally to anyone seems absurd.

I find it further disgusting that MPEG patent inclusion is controlled by a single person, Kenneth Rubenstein, where the temptation is all to obvious.

Patent pooling schemes have been killed historically by the Justice Department for the very reasons that Iviewit complains of, anti-competitive monopolistic practices that violate Sherman and Clayton and almost every antitrust practice. Patent pooling schemes created by lawyers to make money as middlemen also seems to violate ethics.

For instance, how canProskauer and Rubenstein profit from MPEG as counsel for MPEG (as Rubenstein discloses in his deposition at the Iviewit Exhibit gallery) and at the same time take invention disclosure as inventors counsel under Proskauer for review when the patent concepts could completely render MPEG useless, as the Iviewit inventions do, destroying Rubenstein and now PRoskauers pooling schemes?

How can Rubenstein review Iviewit patents for MPEG and at the same time give Iviewit unbiased advice on their patents or control their fate by inclusion or exclusion, while Proskauer and Rubenstein are direct benefactors of the MPEGLA pool profits?

The conflict is as wide as the Grand Canyon, no China Wall, in fact an open door for crime to occur, crimes that violate Article 1, Section 8,Clause 8 inventor protections by those entrusted to protect those rights as part of the patent bar. The obvious is happening here, MPEG andProskauer have found a way to review patents as patent counsel and then steal them as patent poolers looking to profit from others inventions.

The first complaint that was filed at the patent office was in an invention format as a joke, not a joke to laugh at, it was appropriately titled, "System and Method for Committing Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the Iviewit Inventors". I wonder if the patent department will approve it? lol... This is the only thing that Joao,Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Dick, Foley and Lardner, Brian Utley and others accused, ever invented.

Please feel free to contact me for further information or an interview.
wEliot I. BernsteinInventorIviewit Technologies, Inc.
iviewit@iviewit.tv
www.iviewit.tv
http://patentgate.blogspot.com "
r
Source of Post
http://patentgate.blogspot.com/

Posted Here By
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

Open Letter to Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL Board of Directors and Time Warner Shareholders

Time Warner, Warner Bros., and AOL Executives have Been Hiding Massive Shareholder fraud for Over A Decade.

There are Signed Agreements, Contracts, and Tons of Proof that Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL did NOT honor agreements with the iViewit Inventors, yet went ahead and Used the iViewit Technology and made Billions for over a Decade.

Time Warner Inc., Warner Bros., AOL is involved in a Stolen Technology Scandal over the IViewit Technologies, and Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL has been covering it up. Then General Counsel Curtis Lu also covered up this Massive Proven Fraud. This is FACT, there are Links in this Letter to Prove it, they and YOU cannot Say that you did not know.

The Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL Executives - General Counsels and many who worked at Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL over the last decade KNOW of the agreements they had with the iViewit Technology Inventors yet they have NOT disclosed to the Shareholder, Board of Director or investors of Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL. This was BEFORE AOL left Time Warner - the AOL Investors, Shareholders are Still Liable.

Click Below for Warner Bros. Signed Agreements with iViewit Inventors
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf


Warner Bros. Even Signed and Violated Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Confidentialities/confidentialities%20total.pdf

There has been an SEC Complaint Naming Time Warner,
Warner Bros., and AOL ... Click Below to See that Complaint.

https://docs.google.com/View?id=dgvpzjzw_9ghxg4km9

Goldman Sachs Group - Jeff Friedstein Letter
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20001101%20Goldman%20
Friedstein%20Letter%20from%20Buchsbaum%20re%20
AOLTW%20Colter%20meetings.pdf

These Are SOLID, Legally Signed Contracts, Signed Licensing Agreements that were Never Honored, and Time Warner, Warner Bros., and AOL is Liable for every MINUTE of Video in Over 10 Years whereby they used the STOLEN iViewit Technology.

Those invested in Time Warner, Warner Bros., or AOL will pay for what the Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL Executives KNOW and have NOT told You.

Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL Executives have Known for Over a Decade. They want YOU to pay for their Decade Old Mistake.

For over a Decade the Corruption in Courts, Law Firms and in Government Agencies have Covered for Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL Executives.

NOW it is time to pay the Iviewit Technology Inventors for their Invention USED by Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL for Over a Decade. Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOLmade Billions a year off of the Stolen Iviewit Technology.

It will be the Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL Shareholders and Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL Board of Directors that pays for the Crimes and Cover Ups of theTime Warner, Warner Bros., AOL Executives.

This Open Letter Will Go to ALL Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL Board of Directors, Shareholders, Insurance Carriers and ALL Government Agencies Involved to serve as YET another Warning of what will happen to Time Warner, Warner Bros., and AOLShareholders. Just as in the Madoff Scandal, they CANNOT Say they Did Not Know. There is a Whole lot of Fact, Proof that they Did Know and DO Know RIGHT NOW.

Please Forward this Letter to ALL Time Warner, Warner Bros., and AOL Investors, Shareholders, Directors, Executives that You Know of. This is a VERY Big Deal Financially. It is NOT a Hoax, Look at the Fact yourself and Warn Others.

The Stolen Iviewit Technology will Cost Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL Investors, Shareholders Billions. CEO Jeff Bewkes of Time Warner Inc. KNOWS of this Massive Shareholder and is NOT Disclosing to Time Warner, Warner Bros., AOL Board of Directors, Shareholders or Insurance Carriers.

It is Your Money, You Have a Right to Know that Billions will be Paid By Time Warner Inc., Warner Bros., and AOL. in the Iviewit Technology Theft. It is not a Matter of IF, the Proof is ALL there. It is a Matter of When.

More Links to the involvement of Time Warner, Warner Bros. and AOL. in the iViewit Stolen Technology and the Liability Involved to Shareholders.

Proof of Warner Bros. Douglas Chey's Involvement with iViewit

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20
Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf

More on the Liability to Time Warner Inc., Warner Bros., and AOL Shareholders

http://www.antitrustviolations.com/2010/10/massive-liabilities-exist-for-warner.html

Private Placement Memorandum

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Wachovia%20Private%20Placement%20Memorandum%20Bookmarked.pdf

Stephen Lamont - John Calkins Email Feb. 2002

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020208%20Lamont%20to%20Calkins%20Warner%20Bros%20Re%20Colter%20and%20Thagard%20Advisory%20Board%20Stock.pdf

There are Links on the Post Link Below that Suggest AOL Split from TIME Warner Because of the Liability of the STOLEN iViewit Technology.

http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/2010/02/warner-bros-signed-non-disclosure.html

Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger

Crystal@CrystalCox.com