Showing posts with label iViewIt Technologies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label iViewIt Technologies. Show all posts
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Kim Dotcom, Mega Upload, Warner Bros. Steals iViewit Inventions, Uses for Over a Decade for FREE and has the Nerve to Complain about Kim Dotcom of MegaUpload? Kim Schmitz, King Kimble.
Warner Bros. Has Violated a Non-Compete and Signed Agreements for Over a Decade, that Warner Bros. TWX had with the Iviewit Technology Inventors. Warner Bros., TWX has used this video technology all this time and was to pay iViewit Technology per minute, that is worth Billions and the Warner Bros. TWX shareholders have not been warned. Ernst and Young Knows, the SEC knows, the Dept. of Justice knows, the FBI knows and over a decade of liability has built up and still Warner Bros. is above the law, yet the Motion Pictures Association of America (MPAA), Motion Picture Industry Lobbyists and Warner Bros. Complain about Kim Dotcom (Kim Schmitz,King Kimble) infringing on their sacred right to sell us all videos technology that they STOLE from iViewit and for some reason the DOJ, FBI, SEC, and international police jump to it and there you have it, an arrest of MegaUpload's Kim Dotcom (Kim Schmitz,King Kimble) is made and justice is served. What? Really, this is justice? Warner Bros. STOLE the Technology in the first place and used it over a decade for FREE.
Here is the Warner Bros. Contract
Here is the SEC Complaint Naming Warner Bros. and the Motion Picture Association for crimes, conspiracy and cover up with Proskauer Rose Law Firm, MPEG LA, Kenneth Rubenstein and others in the Stealing of the IViewit Technology.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
Here is the iViewit Technologies RICO Complaint naming Warner Bros. - Felony Rico Crimes Warner Bros. conspiring to cover up 13 Trillion Dollar Technology Thefthttp://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf
Andrew Cuomo, former New York Attorney General Now New York Governor, Criminal Complaint Naming Warner Bros.
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=588
Time Warner, Warner Bros. Covering Up Major Shareholder Fraud in IViewit Technology Theft
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?tag=warner-bros
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/
Open Letter to Time Warner Shareholders
http://www.investigativejournalist.net/2011/02/open-letter-to-time-warner-warner-bros.html
http://www.massiveshareholderfraud.com/p/warner-bros-aol-major-shareholder.html
Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Testimony
http://www.crystalcox.com/2011/12/eliot-bernstein-iviewit-testimony-new.html
More on the Iviewit Technology Scandal
Letter to GS regarding Warner Bros. Technological Calls to Iviewit Investors by Warner Bros. employees, describing the efficacy of the Inventions and the results of the review by Warner Bros., including the anticipated uses by Warner Bros et al.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20001101%20Goldman%20Friedstein%20Letter%20from%20Buchsbaum%20re%20AOLTW%20Colter%20meetings.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20001101%20Goldman%20Friedstein%20Letter%20from%20Buchsbaum%20re%20AOLTW%20Colter%20meetings.pdf
Doug Chey
Curtis Lu, Lightsquared - then Time Warner General Counsel
MPEG LA involved in iViewit Technology Theft
Intel Corp Involved
http://www.paulotellini.info/
http://www.paulotellini.info/
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Joseph Leccese, Proskauer Rose does nothing to "Clean Up" Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Why?
Proskauer Rose has been involved in a major scandal for over a Decade. The FBI, Department of Justice, SEC, Florida Supreme Court, Florida State Bar, New York Supreme Court, New York Bar and more have known about this massive fraud for over a decade.
Now the Solution that Proskauer Rose LLP has come up with in order to STOP the Truth from getting to shareholders and investigators is to take the domain names of an investigative blogger, me ~ Crystal L. Cox. Though I have done nothing but EXPOSE the TRUTH about Proskauer Rose Law Firm.
Proskauer Rose is named in SEC Complaint, what is Joseph Leccese, Proskauer Rose's new "Head Guy" doing to investigate this? The solution seems to be to try and intimidate an investigative blogger to cover up decades of secrets, crimes, scandals and cover ups of Proskauer Rose Law Firm.
When Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose should really take a look at ALL the documents, evidence of the iViewit Technologies Case, as there is proof on top of proof of Proskauer Rose Attorneys involvement and it is without a doubt a major Liability to Proskauer Rose.
There is no way to look at all the evidence against Proskauer Rose in the iViewit Stolen Technology case and to not see that Proskauer Rose attorneys are GUILTY. So why is Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose putting his career on the line as new "Head Guy" to support criminals that are now under his management ???
Taking the Domain Names of an Investigative Blogger will now STOP the Truth. There is too much evidence proving the Real Facts of the Stolen iViewit Technology and the Involvement of Proskauer Rose Law Firm.
Here are Some Links to Educate Joseph Leccese, Head Guy at Proskauer Rose Law Firm on the major liability of Proskauer Rose over the Stolen iViewit Technology, in which Joseph Leccese seems to have been lied about by Proskauer Rose attorneys involved such as Kenneth Rubenstein, Matthew Triggs and former Proskauer Rose Attorney Christopher C. Wheeler.
SEC Complaint Naming Proskauer Rose with Details as to what REALLY Happened
Proskauer Rose Liability information
Kenneth Rubenstein's Perjured Deposition
Proskauer Rose Crime Chart
Gregg Mashberg Knows of Fraud and the Connections to Whistleblower Cases
in High Courts of New York
Proskauer Rose Sued in Trillion Dollar Federal RICO Lawsuit over Iviewit Stolen Technology
Information on this Case related to a major Whistleblower Case out of New York
Proskauer Rose MPEG LA Lawyer Sued Over Patents
Lots of Documents, Videos and Information on the FACTS of the Case, should Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose take a good look at the real risk Proskauer Rose face over this 10 year plus case.
Other Links on Proskauer Rose involved in Major Technology Theft
There are over 1200 Documents Online, and massive prove in many federal agencies, federal courts, state bars and for some reason all are protecting Proskauer Rose Law Firm and NOT protecting the Rights of the United States Inventors which is a Constitutional Right. Proskauer Rose is NOT above the Law unless everyone ignores the blatant evidence that proves that Proskauer Rose did in FACT commit these crime and is liable without a doubt for a 13 Trillion Dollar technology theft.
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
NYS Office Of The Attorney General - Researching the WIPO, Proskauer Rose Case
Brooklyn, New York, United States
IP Address: Nys Office Of The Attorney General (12.33.45.253) [Label IP Address]
Referring URL: www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0675
Visit Page: www.proskauerlawfirm.com/
Resources to Research NYAG, iViewit Case
NYAG Office Admits Conflict of Interest with Conversation with Eliot Bernstein
May 22nd 2011 YouTube Upload
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Proskauer Rose LLP and Gregg Mashberg desperate to hide the Truth about Proskauer Rose LLP and Gregg Mashberg involved in iViewit Technology Theft.
The Hypocrits Liars and Thieves at Proskauer Rose Law Firm seem to thing that ReputationDefender will do such a great job making an Elite International Law Firm Look like children on a school project with this internet thing. As ReputationDefender gets DUMB Domain Names and puts out fluff as if those Researching Proskauer Rose LLP and Gregg Mashberg can't look at the 1200 documents of FACT that Proskauer Rose LLP and Gregg Mashberg are involved in a 13 Trillion Dollar Scandal of which has caused massive shareholder fraud.
Proskauer Rose LLP and Gregg Mashberg have also used WIPO ( World Intellectual Property Organization ) to STOP my Investigative blogs on Proskauer Rose LLP and Gregg Mashberg, telling the Truth about Proskauer Rose LLP and Gregg Mashberg .
Do you have a Tip on Proskauer Rose LLP and Gregg Mashberg ?
If you have a Tip on Proskauer Rose LLP or Gregg Mashberg please email your Proskauer Rose LLP and Gregg Mashberg tip to me Crystal@CrystalCox.com .
Here is the Fluff on Gregg Mashberg of Proskauer Rose LLP Law Firm by ReputationDefender - Don't Believe the Hype on Gregg Mashberg of Proskauer Rose LLP Law Firm Look at the Links at the Bottom on Gregg Mashberg of Proskauer Rose LLP Law Firm and do your homework on Gregg Mashberg of Proskauer Rose LLP Law Firm, if any of my links on Gregg Mashberg of Proskauer Rose LLP Law Firm are down, email me for documents on Gregg Mashberg of Proskauer Rose LLP Law Firm first hand - Crystal@CrystalCox.com - Real Research on the TRUTH about Gregg Mashberg of Prokauer Rose LLP Law Firm.
"About Gregg Mashberg
Gregg Mashberg of Proskauer Rose currently co-heads the leading New York law firm’s Securities Litigation &; Enforcement Group Experienced in appearing before trial and appellate courts throughout the United States, Gregg Mashberg has been admitted to the United States Supreme Court, as well as to the Second, Third, Eighth, and Ninth Circuits of the U.S. Court of Appeals and the Eastern and Southern Districts of the U.S. District Court of New York. With wide-ranging expertise in many areas of law, Mashberg holds an impressive record of successful litigation.
Recently, in his work for Proskauer Rose, Gregg Mashberg succeeded in winning a summary judgment for a prominent British corporation in a commercial dispute, which resulted in the dismissal of a complaint seeking $100 million in damages. Additionally, Mashberg has also secured a $3 million federal jury verdict for a client in a stockholders’ derivative action resulting from a Wall Street brokerage house closing its doors. Furthermore, in addition to his corporate litigation work with Proskauer Rose, Gregg Mashberg continues his practice in public law from the early days of his career as an Assistant Chief of the General Litigation Division of the City of New York’s Law Department by representing various city organizations facing law suits. For example, Mashberg successfully defended the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority against a legal challenge to the organization’s decision to increase tolls and fares in 2003.
Moreover, Gregg Mashberg has also worked to extend medical services in New York City by representing St. Vincent’s Catholic Medical Center in an Article 78 proceeding that sought to overturn the decision made by the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission to permit the medical center from demolishing a building located in the Greenwich Village Historic District.
The demolition was sought in order to permit construction of a new $850 million expansion for the hospital. A graduate of the NYU Law School, Gregg Mashberg was elected to the Buffalo Law Review where he completed his first year of legal study."
Source of Proskauer Rose Gregg Mashberg Post
http:// gregg mashberg .word press.com/ about/
Saturday, April 30, 2011
Proskauer Rose Law Firm involved in Major Video Technology Theft. Is Joseph Leccese, Head of Proskauer Rose doing anything?
"MPEG LA involved in Major Video Technology Theft. MPEG LA LLC stole the Iviewit Video Technology
Letter From DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - JOEL I. KLIEN of the Antitrust Division - Assistant Attorney General.
More Iviewit Proof of Fraud and MPEG LA Involvement. Proskauer Rose LLP Corruption. Patent Fraud ?
June 10, 1999 - Letter From DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - JOEL I. KLIEN of the Antitrust Division - Assistant Attorney General
" Carey R. Ramos, Esq.
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019-6064
Dear Mr. Ramos:
This letter is in response to your request on behalf of Hitachi, Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Time Warner Inc., Toshiba Corporation, and Victor Company of Japan, Ltd. (collectively, the "Licensors"), for the issuance of a business review letter pursuant to the Department of Justice's Business Review Procedure, 28 C.F.R. § 50.6.
You have requested a statement of the Department of Justice's antitrust enforcement intentions with respect to a proposed arrangement pursuant to which Toshiba will assemble and offer a package license under the Licensors' patents that are "essential," as defined below, to manufacturing products in compliance with the DVD-ROM and DVD-Video formats and will distribute royalty income to the other Licensors.
I. The DVD-ROM and DVD-Video Formats
The Standard Specifications for the DVD-ROM and DVD-Video formats describe the physical and technical parameters for DVDs for read-only-memory and video applications, respectively, and "rules, conditions and mechanisms" for player units for the two formats.
(1) In either format, the DVD has more than seven times the storage capacity of a compact disc; a single-layer, single-sided DVD, for example, can store 4.7 billion bytes (4.38 GB) of information including audio, video, text, and data. Employing compression technology, a DVD-Video disc can hold a 135-minute feature film on a single side.
The Licensors, along with a number of other producers of consumer electronics hardware, software, or both,
(2) established the Standard Specifications.
(3) These Standard Specifications appear to implicate the intellectual property rights of numerous firms.
II. The Proposed Arrangement
A memorandum of understanding among the Licensors (the "MOU," attached as Exhibit 1 to your letter) sets forth the central terms of the proposed arrangement, pursuant to which Toshiba will aggregate the Licensors' "essential" patents and disseminate rights under them to makers of Digital Versatile Discs (DVDs), DVD players, and DVD decoders
(4) ("DVD Products"), and distribute royalty income to the other Licensors. The arrangement will be carried out through a group of other agreements, including:
(1) a license that Toshiba will receive from each other Licensor to enable Toshiba to license users of the Standard Specifications under that Licensor's "essential" patents (the "Authorization Agreement," attached as Exhibit 3); (2) Toshiba's sublicense to makers of DVD Products under the Licensors' patents (the "DVD Patent License," attached as Exhibit 2);
(3) an agreement among the Licensors concerning the retention and authority of experts to select and evaluate the patents to be licensed (the "Expert Agreement," attached as Exhibit 4); and
(4) the "Ground Rules for Royalty Allocation" (attached as Exhibit 7), which set forth the formula that will determine how Toshiba will distribute royalties among the Licensors.
(5) A. The patents to be licensed In the MOU, the Licensors commit to license each other and third parties to make, use and sell DVD Products under their present and future patents that are "essential" to doing so.
(6) The Licensors agree to two separate means of carrying out this obligation. First, they agree to grant Toshiba the right to sublicense third parties under their present and future "essential" patents for these purposes, and Toshiba agrees in turn to sublicense those patents, along with its own such patents, in the DVD Patent Licenses.
(7) Second, each Licensor agrees to "offer to license its essential DVD patents on a non-exclusive basis to interested third-party licensees pursuant to separate negotiations on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, whether or not said third-party licensees intend to make, use and sell DVD products that are in conformity with the Specifications."
(8) A Licensor's patent is "essential," and thus subject to the commitments in the MOU, if it is "necessarily infringed," or "there is no realistic alternative" to it, "in implementing the DVD Standard Specifications."
(9) Initially, each Licensor will identify its own "essential" patents in an attachment to its Authorization Agreement with Toshiba.
(10) Toshiba will then incorporate those patents in a list attached to the DVD Patent License.
(11) Shortly, however, an expert individual or panel, with "full and sufficient knowledge and skill in the relevant technology,"
(12) will complete a review the patents each Licensor has designated as "essential" in order to determine whether they satisfy the MOU criteria.
(13).MOU, ¶ 8; Expert Agreement, preamble.
(14) At that time, any patent initially designated by a Licensor for inclusion in the DVD Patent License that the expert determines is not "essential" will be excluded from subsequent DVD Patent Licenses, although current licensees will have the option to retain it in their existing licenses.
(15) The expert will repeat this comprehensive review of all the patents in the DVD Patent License portfolio every four years.
(16) In between the quadrennial reviews, the proposed program also provides a mechanism by which the expert may review individual patents whose essentiality comes into question. If a Licensor comes to a good faith conclusion that a licensed patent is not "essential," and provides a reasonable basis for that belief, the expert will re-examine the patent.
(17) If the expert concludes that the patent is not "essential," the patent will be excluded from the DVD Patent License.
(18) The agreement provides that the expert's determinations are "conclusive and non-appealable," although the expert must submit a report explaining any decision that a patent was not "essential."
(19) Compensation will be at the expert's "standard hourly rates."
(20) Each Licensor will bear the cost of the expert's review of its patents; the Licensors will share costs attributable to all of them, such as time spent reviewing the DVD Standard Specifications.
(21) The expert, although retained by the Licensors and selected by a majority vote among them, will not have an economic affiliation with any individual Licensor.
(22) A majority of the Licensors may remove the expert for failure or inability to perform the duties set forth in the Expert Agreement "in a professional, competent, reliable or timely manner."
(23) Although the proposed licensing program currently includes the patents of only the Licensors, it is open to any owner of an "essential" patent willing to license on the program's terms and conditions.(24)
Full Letter and Source of Post
Save and Print the Above for Your Records.
Note: over the Last year of Writing on iViewt the companies at the top of this post have been all over my Blogs, they Ignore what is happening because the UPSTO, US Judges, Corrupt Law Firms like Foley and Lardner and ALL on my blog at http://www.deniedpatent.com/ seem to be protected by US Billionaires and Politicians. THEY knwo that the Massive Shareholder Liability is Inevitable and Are Protecting themselve from it.
No ONE is Protecting Investors or Inventors.
More on the Massive Shareholder Fraud Coming Soon to a Pocket Book near You.
GOOG, MPEG LA LLC,
Friday, April 29, 2011
Joseph Leccese, Proskauer Rose does nothing to "Clean Up" Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Why?
Proskauer Rose has been involved in a major scandal for over a Decade. The FBI, Department of Justice, SEC, Florida Supreme Court, Florida State Bar, New York Supreme Court, New York Bar and more have known about this massive fraud for over a decade.
Now the Solution that Proskauer Rose LLP has come up with in order to STOP the Truth from getting to shareholders and investigators is to take the domain names of an investigative blogger, me ~ Crystal L. Cox. Though I have done nothing but EXPOSE the TRUTH about Proskauer Rose Law Firm.
Proskauer Rose is named in SEC Complaint, what is Joseph Leccese, Proskauer Rose's new "Head Guy" doing to investigate this? The solution seems to be to try and intimidate an investigative blogger to cover up decades of secrets, crimes, scandals and cover ups of Proskauer Rose Law Firm.
When Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose should really take a look at ALL the documents, evidence of the iViewit Technologies Case, as there is proof on top of proof of Proskauer Rose attorneys involvement and it is without a doubt a major Liability to Proskauer Rose.
When Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose should really take a look at ALL the documents, evidence of the iViewit Technologies Case, as there is proof on top of proof of Proskauer Rose attorneys involvement and it is without a doubt a major Liability to Proskauer Rose.
There is no way to look at all the evidence against Proskauer Rose in the iViewit Stolen Technology case and to not see that Proskauer Rose attorneys are GUILTY. So why is Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose putting his career on the line as new "Head Guy" to support criminals that are now under his management ???
Taking the Domain Names of an Investigative Blogger will now STOP the Truth. There is too much evidence proving the Real Facts of the Stolen iViewit Technology and the Involvement of Proskauer Rose Law Firm.
Here are Some Links to Educate Joseph Leccese, Head Guy at Proskauer Rose Law Firm on the major liability of Proskauer Rose over the Stolen iViewit Technology, in which Joseph Leccese seems to have been lied about by Proskauer Rose attorneys involved such as Kenneth Rubenstein, Matthew Triggs and former Proskauer Rose Attorney Christopher C. Wheeler.
SEC Complaint Naming Proskauer Rose with Details as to what REALLY Happened
Proskauer Rose Liability information
Kenneth Rubenstein's Perjured Deposition
Proskauer Rose Crime Chart
Gregg Mashberg Knows of Fraud and the Connections to Whistleblower Cases
in High Courts of New York
Proskauer Rose Sued in Trillion Dollar Federal RICO Lawsuit over Iviewit Stolen Technology
Information on this Case related to a major Whistleblower Case out of New York
Proskauer Rose MPEG LA Lawyer Sued Over Patents
Lots of Documents, Videos and Information on the FACTS of the Case, should Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose take a good look at the real risk Proskauer Rose face over this 10 year plus case.
Other Links on Proskauer Rose involved in Major Technology Theft
There are over 1200 Documents Online, and massive prove in many federal agencies, federal courts, state bars and for some reason all are protecting Proskauer Rose Law Firm and NOT protecting the Rights of the United States Inventors which is a Constitutional Right. Proskauer Rose is NOT above the Law unless everyone ignores the blatant evidence that proves that Proskauer Rose did in FACT commit these crime and is liable without a doubt for a 13 Trillion Dollar technology theft.
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)