Proskauer Rose Guilty, Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court
Showing posts with label New York Corruption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York Corruption. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Proskauer Rose LLP, Proskauer Law Firm, Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud.. IViewit is Next. 13 Trillion Dollar Scandal, USPTO, DOJ, SEC, knows of Massive Shareholder Fraud.
"Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey.
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more.
Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey.
Stanford Trial Drags Former Proskauer, Chadbourne Partner Back into Spotlight
Brian Baxter The American Lawyer February 8, 2012
View Article Click Below
http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202541880071&slreturn=1
—–
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more
—
—-
United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit
Justices: Debra Ann Livingston, Richard C. Wesley, Peter W. Hall and- Ralph K. Winter, Jr.
—-
Eliot Ivan Bernstein, Pro Se Plaintiff – Appellant
–v–
Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al. Defendants / Appellees
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
CASE 07 Civ. 11196 (Shira Anne Scheindlin)
LEGALLY Related Case to Iviewit RICO by Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin to:
(07 Civ. 9599) (SAS-AJP) WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT of Christine C. Anderson, Esq. v. the State of New York, et al.
(Anderson, a Former New York Supreme Court Attorney)
Cases Legally Related to Anderson / Iviewit:
1. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
2. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
3. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
4. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
5. Related Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
6. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
7. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
8. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
9. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
10. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
11. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.
12. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.
13. 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
14. 08cv4438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
15. 08 cv 6368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
16. 06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al.
ELIOT IVAN BERNSTEIN, PRO SE
2753 N.W. 34TH STREET BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o) / (561) 886.7628 (c) / (561) 245-8644 (f)
iviewit@iviewit.tv / www.iviewit.tv
Table of Contents
Conflict of Interest (COI) Disclosure Form… 6
Motion to.. 22
I. Introduction.. 23
a. Christine c. Anderson, Esq., new york supreme court attorney Whistleblower Testimony Reveals a Criminal RICO Cartel Coup D’ÉTAT on government at the highest outposts of law and regulation.. 23
b. Meet the coupsters.. 26
c. The Controlled Demolition of World Markets by Attorneys at Law operating as a criminal rico enterprise and infiltrating senior pUBLIC offices, including within the department of justice and the courts.. 39
d. Where is the Justice? THe CRIMINAL role of this court in AIDING AND ABETTING the criminal rico enterprise.. 48
II. IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have currently acted in this Lawsuit in anyway whatsoever, for their part in Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process, HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS and more.. 69
III. Remand, Halt and Rehear this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest, both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel their office and additionally for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit, by Violating Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law 83
IV. Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson’s Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials and more. 92
HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of, the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, Justices of the courts, Officers of the New York Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments, officers of the new york supreme court disciplinary departments and others, based on FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS in US Federal Court and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Felony Crimes alleged by Anderson, directly relate to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, including having several identical New York State Public Official Actor/Defendants and the allegations are wholly germane to the nexus of the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit Crimes alleged. Further the two lawsuits are “Legally Related” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin. 96
V. Remove and report ALL other Conflicts of Interest, violations of public office rules, violations of judicial cannons, attorney conduct codes and state and federal law, currently in place in this RICO Lawsuit and related cases, in order to impart fair and impartial DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW… 96
VI. DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, etc. sign Affirmed Conflict of Interest Disclosures, identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. 97
VII. Demand for Justices of the SECOND CIRCUIT to turn themselves in to State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.. 97
VIII. Alleged crimes ongoing by p. stephen lamont et al. both known and unknown and fraud on this court, the us district court and now other courts including the supreme court and more. 98
IX. PLAINTIFF SEEKS LEAVE TO AMEND THE AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD NEW DEFENDANTS AND NEW ALLEGED CRIMES NEWLY DISCOVERED.. 98
X. Relief.. 99
Exhibit 1 – conflict of interest disclosure PARTIAL LIST OF KNOWN CONFLICTED PARTIES. 100
Exhibit 2. 106
EXHIBIT 3 – Criminal Complaint S. 108
Exhibit 4 – Ethics Complaint. 108
MOTION TO:
· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit by Violating Public Office Rules &; Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law.
· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court’s Attorney Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson’s (“Anderson”) Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials et al.
· HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, New York State Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments and others.
FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS EXPOSED in US Federal District Court, THIS COURT and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee by the HEROIC TESTIMONY and SWORN STATEMENTS of NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY WHISTLEBLOWER, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON.
· IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have acted to this point in this Lawsuit in any capacity whatsoever, for Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process and more.
· Remove ALL other Conflicts of Interest currently in place in this Lawsuit in order to implement FAIR & IMPARTIAL DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW.
· DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, et al. Sign and Affirm Conflict of Interest Disclosures identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.
· Demand for Justices and others named herein of this Court to turn themselves in to the appropriate State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.
——
Caution! if you have not signed the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure form and returned it as instructed and you continue to act in any manner whatsoever in these matters, Criminal Charges will be brought against you, for Obstruction of Justice, Aiding & Abetting a Criminal RICO Organization and More. see the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for further information regarding your potential personal and professional liabilities.
—–
I. Introduction
“What country before ever existed a century &; a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.
The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon &; pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure.”
The “Tree of Liberty” letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Smith http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96oct/obrien/blood.htm
A. NEW YORK SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON, ESQ. (“Anderson”) MAKES FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS IN US FEDERAL COURT AND BEFORE THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SENIOR RANKING OFFICIALS OF THE US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY DEPARTMENTS, “FAVORED LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS” [Footnote 3] and names a “CLEANER” [Footnote 4] , as revealed in federal court testimony, a one Naomi Goldstein.
THESE ALLEGATIONS DEMAND IMMEDIATE REPORTING, INVESTIGATION AND HALTING OF THE LEGALLY RELATED IVIEWIT RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT IN ORDER TO BEGIN INVESTIGATIONS TO IDENTIFY AND PROSECUTE THOSE FINGERED BY WHISTLE BLOWER ANDERSON and OTHERS.
—
[3] From Anderson’s Sworn Statement to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee, “Specifically, I discovered and reported that employees of the DDC had engaged in, inter alia, the “whitewashing” [of] complaints of misconduct leveled against certain “select” attorneys and law firms.
This “whitewashing” sometimes involved burying cases or destroying evidence, so that certain complaints were inevitably, unavoidably, dismissed. I witnessed this destruction of evidence myself. Other reported misconduct involves victimizing attorneys lacking privileged positions or connections.”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=365
[4] “Legal Document: Request for Discovery” Posted on July 22, 2011 by Fred Celani
http://fredcelani.wordpress.com/2011/07/22/request-for-discovery/
—
The “Legally Related” Federal Lawsuit of New York Supreme Court Veteran Senior Supreme Court Disciplinary Department Attorney and Expert in Attorney Criminal Misconduct Complaints, Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq., by Federal Judge Shira Anne Scheindlin to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, exposes from the inside, a legal conspiracy of corruption involving the highest levels of Regulatory, Prosecutorial and Judicial Public Offices both State and Federal. Heroism is a word earned through action. The Whistleblowing Efforts of Anderson, another New York Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower and Hero, Nicole Corrado, Esq., and, a Sitting New York Supreme Court Justice, Honorable Duane A. Hart, Esq., all cited herein, should be the Moniker of HEROISM for others in the legal profession to follow.
These Whistleblowers Expose Corruption at the Top of Government, including the Courts, this Court, the Department of Justice, the New York Attorney General and others.
They further provide the World with an understanding of how America’s Financial System has melted top down, from rigged economic breakdowns and controlled demolition of world markets through fraud, with no Regulators or Prosecutors or Courts to stop it, in fact, all of them Aiding and Abetting the crimes.
Nobody attempting to RECOVER the stolen funds for the PEOPLE, as all of the Top Government Officials charged with enforcement of the Law, appear on the take and part of the crimes according to these Whistleblowers. These Whistleblowing efforts expose how and why no one on Wall Street/Greed Street/Fraud Street has been charged with Criminal Acts, despite massive and overwhelming evidence of CRIMINAL ACTS and FRAUD.
Further exposed, is why none of the Stolen Loot from these Economic Crimes have been recovered back to the People. What is unveiled is a COUP D’ÉTAT on the HIGHEST OUTPOSTS OF LAW & ORDER in the United States and yet not a single story in the Mainstream Media aka US Pravda Press, regarding these shocking allegations by inside Whistleblowers.
Exposed by these HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS is a REVOLVING DOOR between a licentious GROUP OF LAW FIRMS and ATTORNEYS AT LAW, acting in both PRIVATE PRACTICE and PUBLIC OFFICE, working together in CONSPIRACY and forming a RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION with tentacles embedded at the highest outposts of the US Government in order to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE for the CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.
Anderson, Corrado and Other Public Office Whistleblowers cited herein, also provide explanation for why Judges and Attorneys at Law are now desperately trying to grant themselves immunity for felony crimes and attempting to use the State Attorney General Offices and other Government officials as accomplice in the cover-up.
Immunity for ATTORNEYS AT LAW for their role in TORTURE CRIMES, WAR CRIMES and ECONOMIC CRIMES, crimes that include the CREATION OF ILLEGAL/FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL & INSURANCE CONTRACTS that led to the RIGGED HOUSING and MARKET COLLAPSES, that led to MILLIONS OF VERY ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES and left MILLIONS UNEMPLOYED AND STARVING. Seeking immunity for crime, as a legal defense is both futile and an obvious admission of guilt, which will never hold in a fair and impartial court of law?
The attempts to gain immunity for FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS shows culpability in the crimes, exposing fear by the guilty of retribution of the day when the “long arm of the law” swings back.
Fear that they will hang for their crimes against Humanity, their War Crimes (Illegal Undeclared Wars of Aggression, Torture, Misappropriation of Public funds by Congress for Undeclared Wars, Economic Terrorism and more) and they must hope for dirty courts to clear them forever.
Whistleblowing comes at a price to Whistleblowers in this new environment of a CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT.
Christine Anderson, Corrado, Hart and others, including PLAINTIFF have been through hell to bring this INFORMATION TO LIGHT and where this Court should acknowledge Anderson, Corrado and the others who have come forth for their HEROISM, suspiciously, they do not.
These are TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOTS, HEROES and ROLE MODELS OF ETHICS shunned by the very legal system they work in.
We instead find this Court currently attempting to ILLEGALLY DISMISS Anderson’s WHISTLEBLOWER Lawsuit and the “legally related” cases prior to investigations and hearings of the criminal acts exposed by government officials against other Senior Ranking Officials.
We find THIS COURT attempting to BURY THE FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES EXPOSED BY CREDIBLE WITNESSES in a FEDERAL COURT by “SWEEPING THEM UNDER THE RUG,”
PRIOR TO INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED BY LAW, as more fully defined herein. Therefore, Plaintiff starts this Motion in Honor.
A Tip of the Hat to the TRUE PATRIOTS NAMED HEREIN AND THEIR HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS TO BLOW THE LID OFF ONE OF THE LARGEST CORRUPTION STORIES OF ALL TIME, PLACING MEMBERS OF THIS COURT RIGHT IN THE CENTER of world market fraud and more, A ROOT OF THE PROBLEM."
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more.
Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey.
Stanford Trial Drags Former Proskauer, Chadbourne Partner Back into Spotlight
Brian Baxter The American Lawyer February 8, 2012
View Article Click Below
http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202541880071&slreturn=1
—–
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more
—
IVIEWIT DRAFT MOTION TO SECOND CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS OF CONFLICTS
Case No. 08-4873-CV—-
United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit
Justices: Debra Ann Livingston, Richard C. Wesley, Peter W. Hall and- Ralph K. Winter, Jr.
—-
Eliot Ivan Bernstein, Pro Se Plaintiff – Appellant
–v–
Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al. Defendants / Appellees
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
CASE 07 Civ. 11196 (Shira Anne Scheindlin)
LEGALLY Related Case to Iviewit RICO by Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin to:
(07 Civ. 9599) (SAS-AJP) WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT of Christine C. Anderson, Esq. v. the State of New York, et al.
(Anderson, a Former New York Supreme Court Attorney)
Cases Legally Related to Anderson / Iviewit:
1. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
2. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
3. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
4. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
5. Related Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
6. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
7. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
8. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
9. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
10. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
11. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.
12. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.
13. 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
14. 08cv4438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
15. 08 cv 6368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
16. 06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al.
ELIOT IVAN BERNSTEIN, PRO SE
2753 N.W. 34TH STREET BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o) / (561) 886.7628 (c) / (561) 245-8644 (f)
iviewit@iviewit.tv / www.iviewit.tv
Table of Contents
Conflict of Interest (COI) Disclosure Form… 6
Motion to.. 22
I. Introduction.. 23
a. Christine c. Anderson, Esq., new york supreme court attorney Whistleblower Testimony Reveals a Criminal RICO Cartel Coup D’ÉTAT on government at the highest outposts of law and regulation.. 23
b. Meet the coupsters.. 26
c. The Controlled Demolition of World Markets by Attorneys at Law operating as a criminal rico enterprise and infiltrating senior pUBLIC offices, including within the department of justice and the courts.. 39
d. Where is the Justice? THe CRIMINAL role of this court in AIDING AND ABETTING the criminal rico enterprise.. 48
II. IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have currently acted in this Lawsuit in anyway whatsoever, for their part in Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process, HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS and more.. 69
III. Remand, Halt and Rehear this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest, both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel their office and additionally for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit, by Violating Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law 83
IV. Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson’s Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials and more. 92
HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of, the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, Justices of the courts, Officers of the New York Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments, officers of the new york supreme court disciplinary departments and others, based on FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS in US Federal Court and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Felony Crimes alleged by Anderson, directly relate to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, including having several identical New York State Public Official Actor/Defendants and the allegations are wholly germane to the nexus of the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit Crimes alleged. Further the two lawsuits are “Legally Related” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin. 96
V. Remove and report ALL other Conflicts of Interest, violations of public office rules, violations of judicial cannons, attorney conduct codes and state and federal law, currently in place in this RICO Lawsuit and related cases, in order to impart fair and impartial DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW… 96
VI. DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, etc. sign Affirmed Conflict of Interest Disclosures, identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. 97
VII. Demand for Justices of the SECOND CIRCUIT to turn themselves in to State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.. 97
VIII. Alleged crimes ongoing by p. stephen lamont et al. both known and unknown and fraud on this court, the us district court and now other courts including the supreme court and more. 98
IX. PLAINTIFF SEEKS LEAVE TO AMEND THE AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD NEW DEFENDANTS AND NEW ALLEGED CRIMES NEWLY DISCOVERED.. 98
X. Relief.. 99
Exhibit 1 – conflict of interest disclosure PARTIAL LIST OF KNOWN CONFLICTED PARTIES. 100
Exhibit 2. 106
EXHIBIT 3 – Criminal Complaint S. 108
Exhibit 4 – Ethics Complaint. 108
MOTION TO:
· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit by Violating Public Office Rules &; Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law.
· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court’s Attorney Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson’s (“Anderson”) Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials et al.
· HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, New York State Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments and others.
FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS EXPOSED in US Federal District Court, THIS COURT and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee by the HEROIC TESTIMONY and SWORN STATEMENTS of NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY WHISTLEBLOWER, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON.
· IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have acted to this point in this Lawsuit in any capacity whatsoever, for Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process and more.
· Remove ALL other Conflicts of Interest currently in place in this Lawsuit in order to implement FAIR & IMPARTIAL DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW.
· DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, et al. Sign and Affirm Conflict of Interest Disclosures identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.
· Demand for Justices and others named herein of this Court to turn themselves in to the appropriate State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.
——
Caution! if you have not signed the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure form and returned it as instructed and you continue to act in any manner whatsoever in these matters, Criminal Charges will be brought against you, for Obstruction of Justice, Aiding & Abetting a Criminal RICO Organization and More. see the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for further information regarding your potential personal and professional liabilities.
—–
I. Introduction
“What country before ever existed a century &; a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.
The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon &; pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure.”
The “Tree of Liberty” letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Smith http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96oct/obrien/blood.htm
A. NEW YORK SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON, ESQ. (“Anderson”) MAKES FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS IN US FEDERAL COURT AND BEFORE THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SENIOR RANKING OFFICIALS OF THE US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY DEPARTMENTS, “FAVORED LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS” [Footnote 3] and names a “CLEANER” [Footnote 4] , as revealed in federal court testimony, a one Naomi Goldstein.
THESE ALLEGATIONS DEMAND IMMEDIATE REPORTING, INVESTIGATION AND HALTING OF THE LEGALLY RELATED IVIEWIT RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT IN ORDER TO BEGIN INVESTIGATIONS TO IDENTIFY AND PROSECUTE THOSE FINGERED BY WHISTLE BLOWER ANDERSON and OTHERS.
—
[3] From Anderson’s Sworn Statement to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee, “Specifically, I discovered and reported that employees of the DDC had engaged in, inter alia, the “whitewashing” [of] complaints of misconduct leveled against certain “select” attorneys and law firms.
This “whitewashing” sometimes involved burying cases or destroying evidence, so that certain complaints were inevitably, unavoidably, dismissed. I witnessed this destruction of evidence myself. Other reported misconduct involves victimizing attorneys lacking privileged positions or connections.”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=365
[4] “Legal Document: Request for Discovery” Posted on July 22, 2011 by Fred Celani
http://fredcelani.wordpress.com/2011/07/22/request-for-discovery/
—
The “Legally Related” Federal Lawsuit of New York Supreme Court Veteran Senior Supreme Court Disciplinary Department Attorney and Expert in Attorney Criminal Misconduct Complaints, Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq., by Federal Judge Shira Anne Scheindlin to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, exposes from the inside, a legal conspiracy of corruption involving the highest levels of Regulatory, Prosecutorial and Judicial Public Offices both State and Federal. Heroism is a word earned through action. The Whistleblowing Efforts of Anderson, another New York Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower and Hero, Nicole Corrado, Esq., and, a Sitting New York Supreme Court Justice, Honorable Duane A. Hart, Esq., all cited herein, should be the Moniker of HEROISM for others in the legal profession to follow.
These Whistleblowers Expose Corruption at the Top of Government, including the Courts, this Court, the Department of Justice, the New York Attorney General and others.
They further provide the World with an understanding of how America’s Financial System has melted top down, from rigged economic breakdowns and controlled demolition of world markets through fraud, with no Regulators or Prosecutors or Courts to stop it, in fact, all of them Aiding and Abetting the crimes.
Nobody attempting to RECOVER the stolen funds for the PEOPLE, as all of the Top Government Officials charged with enforcement of the Law, appear on the take and part of the crimes according to these Whistleblowers. These Whistleblowing efforts expose how and why no one on Wall Street/Greed Street/Fraud Street has been charged with Criminal Acts, despite massive and overwhelming evidence of CRIMINAL ACTS and FRAUD.
Further exposed, is why none of the Stolen Loot from these Economic Crimes have been recovered back to the People. What is unveiled is a COUP D’ÉTAT on the HIGHEST OUTPOSTS OF LAW & ORDER in the United States and yet not a single story in the Mainstream Media aka US Pravda Press, regarding these shocking allegations by inside Whistleblowers.
Exposed by these HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS is a REVOLVING DOOR between a licentious GROUP OF LAW FIRMS and ATTORNEYS AT LAW, acting in both PRIVATE PRACTICE and PUBLIC OFFICE, working together in CONSPIRACY and forming a RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION with tentacles embedded at the highest outposts of the US Government in order to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE for the CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.
Anderson, Corrado and Other Public Office Whistleblowers cited herein, also provide explanation for why Judges and Attorneys at Law are now desperately trying to grant themselves immunity for felony crimes and attempting to use the State Attorney General Offices and other Government officials as accomplice in the cover-up.
Immunity for ATTORNEYS AT LAW for their role in TORTURE CRIMES, WAR CRIMES and ECONOMIC CRIMES, crimes that include the CREATION OF ILLEGAL/FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL & INSURANCE CONTRACTS that led to the RIGGED HOUSING and MARKET COLLAPSES, that led to MILLIONS OF VERY ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES and left MILLIONS UNEMPLOYED AND STARVING. Seeking immunity for crime, as a legal defense is both futile and an obvious admission of guilt, which will never hold in a fair and impartial court of law?
The attempts to gain immunity for FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS shows culpability in the crimes, exposing fear by the guilty of retribution of the day when the “long arm of the law” swings back.
Fear that they will hang for their crimes against Humanity, their War Crimes (Illegal Undeclared Wars of Aggression, Torture, Misappropriation of Public funds by Congress for Undeclared Wars, Economic Terrorism and more) and they must hope for dirty courts to clear them forever.
Whistleblowing comes at a price to Whistleblowers in this new environment of a CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT.
Christine Anderson, Corrado, Hart and others, including PLAINTIFF have been through hell to bring this INFORMATION TO LIGHT and where this Court should acknowledge Anderson, Corrado and the others who have come forth for their HEROISM, suspiciously, they do not.
These are TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOTS, HEROES and ROLE MODELS OF ETHICS shunned by the very legal system they work in.
We instead find this Court currently attempting to ILLEGALLY DISMISS Anderson’s WHISTLEBLOWER Lawsuit and the “legally related” cases prior to investigations and hearings of the criminal acts exposed by government officials against other Senior Ranking Officials.
We find THIS COURT attempting to BURY THE FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES EXPOSED BY CREDIBLE WITNESSES in a FEDERAL COURT by “SWEEPING THEM UNDER THE RUG,”
PRIOR TO INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED BY LAW, as more fully defined herein. Therefore, Plaintiff starts this Motion in Honor.
A Tip of the Hat to the TRUE PATRIOTS NAMED HEREIN AND THEIR HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS TO BLOW THE LID OFF ONE OF THE LARGEST CORRUPTION STORIES OF ALL TIME, PLACING MEMBERS OF THIS COURT RIGHT IN THE CENTER of world market fraud and more, A ROOT OF THE PROBLEM."
Source and Full Article
More on the iViewit Story
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Proskauer Rose lies to the courts over their Involvement in Stealing a 13 Trillion Dollar Patent. Proskauer Rose Fraud, Corruption and Cover Ups.
May 2004 - Proskauer Rose Corruption Letter to Thomas Cahill from iViewit
"Thomas J. Cahill
Chief Counsel
First Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee
61 Broadway, 2nd Floor
New York, New York 10006
Re: Complaint of Iviewit Holdings, Inc., Against Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq., Docket
2003.0531: Demand to Strike Response
Dear Mr. Cahill:
By way of introduction, I am Chief Executive Officer (Acting) of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (collectively, “Company”) with a background of which the Company invites you to
view at http://www.iviewit.com/management.htm and I write to demand the striking of the
response of Kenneth Rubenstein (“Respondent”) to the Company’s New York State Bar
Association Complaint of February 26, 2003 (“Complaint”).
Moreover, upon information belief, the response of Respondent was authored by Steven C. Krane
a partner at Proskauer Rose LLP, then the direct past President of the New York State Bar
Association (“NYSBA”) whom held a myriad of positions of influence at the NYSBA at the time
he authored the response for Respondent, also a partner of Proskauer Rose LLP.
The conflict of interest is inherent that while maintaining such positions of influence at the NYSBA, Mr. Krane was also a partner of the same law firm as Respondent, Proskauer Rose LLP, and it is astounding
that the NYSBA would allow one with such a highly conflicted position to even be part of the
response process of the Respondent, let alone sign a document authored in his defense. In fact,
the Complaint against the Respondent transcends his singular role as an attorney in the matter and
in all other state and federal complaints is directed at the entire firm of Proskauer Rose LLP.
This so taints both the entire review of this matter in addition to tainting the NYSBA that we demand a
review of this matter by an unbiased party with authority over the discipline of New York
attorneys and discipline over the NYSBA.
Presently, Mr. Krane holds the following positions, whereby the matter against Respondent must elevate beyond any association with any organization where Mr. Krane has any form of influence that could further prejudice this matter in favor of his partner, Kenneth Rubenstein and their law firm Proskauer Rose LLP:
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, HOUSE OF DELEGATES,
1996 - PRESENT
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, VICE-CHAIR, COMMITTEE ON THE
FUTURE OF THE PROFESSION, 1997 – PRESENT
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, CHAIR, SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO
REVIEW THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, 1995 – PRESENT
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO
REVIEW THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, 1992-1995
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMITTEE ON
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, 1990-1994
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, CHAIR, TASK FORCE ON
SIMPLIFICATION OF LAW, 1989-1991; MEMBER 1988-1989, 1991-1992
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, MEMBER, COMMITTEE ON COURTS
OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION, 1984-1988
FINALLY, AT THE TIME OF HIS RESPONSE FOR RESPONDENT, KRANE WAS
THE IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT OF THE NEW YORK STATE BAR
Accordingly, by the authorship of the response of Respondent, said response cannot be viewed in
an unbiased manner, and is so highly conflicted, that it constitutes no response at all in the
defense of Respondent and should be stricken in his defense according to the demand stated
herein.
Furthermore, once stricken, Respondent has made no response at all in his defense,
whereby the Company demands the immediate investigation of its specific, factual allegations
against Respondent and Mr. Krane by an unbiased third party with a view towards administering
discipline, whether by admonishment, reprimand, suspension, resignation, or disbarment, but
preferably move this matter to the next higher level of review where Mr. Krane has no
membership or appointed position.
Let this letter serve additionally as a formal complaint against Mr. Krane with NYSBA and any
oversight department for the NYSBA. We charge that Mr. Krane has a multiplicity of conflicts of
interests in his highly unethical and self-serving behavior of using his position of influence at the
NYSBA designed to protect consumer interests against unethical attorneys, to attempt to malign
justice in favor of an attorney who is his partner and his law firm Proskauer Rose LLP and
exculpate them from such charges. If you need any further form of formal complaint filed against
Mr. Krane, please notify us immediately.
We also ask for a formal retraction and redaction from Mr. Krane of every statement made by
him in defense of the Respondent, so that we may circulate such retraction and redaction to every
state and federal agency currently reviewing the matter against Respondent and the entire law
firm of Proskauer Rose LLP, whom have also been tainted by such maligned statements.
Since the Respondent’s response defense has been used as defense in the following investigations and
court cases a retraction/redaction is necessary in order that the Company may notify such
authorities of the biases inherent in the defense for:
Complaint against Christopher C. Wheeler with The Florida State Bar
Complaint against William J. Dick with the Virginia State Bar
Complaint against Raymond Joao with the NYSBA
Proskauer Rose LLP v. Iviewit in the 15th
Civil Circuit Court of West Palm Beach, FL.
Furthermore, although distinct complaints have been filed against Raymond Joao who is not a
Proskauer Rose LLP attorney, yet upon information and belief we have been told by the NYSBA
that the two complaints have been merged we demand an immediate uncoupling so that the Joao
complaint does not suffer the bias inherent in the Respondent’s Complaint.
We ask similarly that the same actions as directed herein for Respondent’s Complaint be administered to Joao’s complaint.
Finally, Mr. Krane in his defense on behalf of Respondent attempts an unfounded attack on the
statements made by the inventor Eliot Bernstein whom all such personal affronts seem worthless
in view of recent complaints filed against Proskauer Rose LLP and Respondent to the
Commissioner of Patent & Trademarks for the United States Patent & Trademark Office whereby
claims of FRAUD UPON THE UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE by
Respondent and the entire firm of Proskauer Rose LLP, including MR. Krane, were co-signed by
the Company’s largest investor, Stephen J. Warner, Chairman & Co-Founder of Crossbow
Ventures, Inc the largest and most prominent venture fund in South Florida.
Attached to this communication are the following items:
Biography of Steven Krane from the Proskauer Rose LLP website
Biography of Kenneth Rubenstein from the Proskauer Rose LLP website
Response of Steven Krane on behalf of Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer Rose LLP to
the NY Bar
Rebuttal of Iviewit (without exhibits) to response of Steven Krane on behalf of the
Iviewit shareholders..."
Source of Proskauer Rose Corruption Post
posted here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Thursday, February 3, 2011
What is Being Done About the Wall of Corruption in New York ? Christine C. Anderson New York Corruption Whistleblower
Government Entities such as the Tenth Judicial Grievance Committee in New York are Part of the Problem and no where near a part of the Solution.
Christine Anderson New York Corruption Whistleblower
Enough is Enough New York.
Expose Corrupt Law Firms and the Judges Who Protect them.
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Christine Anderson New York Corruption Whistleblower
Enough is Enough New York.
Expose Corrupt Law Firms and the Judges Who Protect them.
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
What is the Real Story Behind Valley Stream No. 24, Kevin Chesney and NY Attorney Ruth Pollack ?
What is Really Going on at the Valley Stream No. 24 ? It is time to find out what "Lies Beneath" the Secret Veil of Corruption at Valley Stream No. 24 - in New York State.
News Article Archive
"By the End of 2007 - 2008 Valley Stream No. 24 had amassed $3.09 Million in Excess Reserves, more then 3 Times the Legal Amount. Auditors found that the district's budgeted expenses consistently exceeded amounts needed, concluding that this was done deliberately"
So was anyone ever held liable? was the TRUTH ever told?
Big Money - Big Consequences for
the Truth Told about that Money.
Demand ALL Accounting of Valley Stream No. 24 - This is Your Money, What is really going on at Valley Stream No. 24 ? Who gets work contracts, what conflicts of interest exist - Who Is Protecting whom and why ?
Under Freedom of Information, Can't you Request what this Money is spent on, where it comes from and why. It seems to me that if the Millions of Dollars at Valley Stream No. 24 is used to help protect the Wall of Corruption in New York and that if the New York Grievance Committee, New York Bar, Second Department and other New York and Federal Agencies are used to SHUT UP an attorney on a Case that seems to me to simply be about ... some guy getting hurt at work..
Who Got Contracts? Who got Paid and what for.. ??
You have a Right to Know.
You have a Right to Know.
What Politicians or Public Officials are paid off, if any to protect this BIG money going through the hands of Valley Stream No. 24 ?
Who Would Kill to cover this Fraud Up? Who would Do just about anything to keep this kind of money, where it came from.. where it is going .. as a "Secret" ?
What if an Honest New York Attorney stumbled on the Truth or took on a Case in which "Discovery" would Turn up the Truth on the ... Valley Stream No. 24 - How About they some how convince the New York Bar, and a Corrupt New York Grievance Committee to simply Suspend the Attorney, take her Life as she knows it and Call it a Day. That oughta shut her up right? Well unless she has any morals or a backbone !!
Did they think If she is Suspended or perhaps even Dis-barred... well then surely no one will believe her right? And Surely if there is No "Discover" in this case, well then we can keep out dirty little ... Secret, Right?
Time to Expose the Secrets of
Valley Stream No. 24
Got a Tip on all that Money Valley Stream No. 24 ?
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
What is the Real Reason for the Absurd Suspension of New York Attorney, Ruth Pollack?
I mean come on she is certainly not a "George Demos", covering a $335 Million Dollar JP Morgan Secret.. She seems to be an Independent Attorney, simply doing her thing... so what in the World did she stumble on that makes these powerful people want to Discredit Her?
Well I will Be Exploring that Question in Great Detail On My Whistle Blower Media Blog Network, Stay Tuned ...
I mean come on she is certainly not a "George Demos", covering a $335 Million Dollar JP Morgan Secret.. She seems to be an Independent Attorney, simply doing her thing... so what in the World did she stumble on that makes these powerful people want to Discredit Her?
Well I will Be Exploring that Question in Great Detail On My Whistle Blower Media Blog Network, Stay Tuned ...
Also Coming Soon EdwardFale.com - to Expose Every Dollar, Every Dirty Deal withing the Valley Stream No. 24 ~ What is it that is so Secret, So Important that the New York Wall of Corruption would be recruited to help cover it up ?
The Collateral Damage in the Valley Stream No. 24 Scandal is many - particularly of interest to me is the Career and Quality of Life of One BOLD New York Whistleblower Attorney Ruth Pollack. And the Quality of Life of Kevin Chesney, he client in the Valley Stream No. 24 Scandal.
Coming Soon the Whole story of what made Ruth M. Pollack New York Attorney and Kevin Chesney Collateral Damage in a wall of corruption war in New York politics and high finance in which they had NOTHING to do with.
* I will Explore the Question of why so many Travel Expenses with Valley Stream No. 24 . What was Edward Fale, Valley Stream No. 24 Superintendent Really Up To.
* I will discuss Minerva & D'Agostino Law firm and what they may have to Hide.
* The Truth about the Hiring of Therapists without a Criminal Background Check. Who were they, who were they related or connected to... Who is Metro Therapy Inc. and what did they real gain or have to hide.. - Coming Soon..
* I will Explore the "Books" or the "cooking of the books"
* I will Expose all Legal Fees and Professional Services EVERY used... how much they cost and why that person or company was chosen..
* Just who is Anthony Iadevaio (is he a police officer?) and what are the Conflicts of Interest, Money Paid..
* Why was "Computer Access Rights" purged with an Incoming State Audit?
What Makes Valley Stream No. 24 and their Den of Secrets and Financial Cover Ups so important that the New York Corruption Mill is fighting to keep an Honest New York Attorney from simply going about her life and her law practice?
Well I Intend to Find Out ..
These Questions.. and Many more To be Explored Soon.. Check for EdwardFale.com in the near future, or simply google anything on this page and you will find what I am Yapping about it.
Got a Tip
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)