Showing posts with label Proskauer Rose. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Proskauer Rose. Show all posts
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Proskauer Rose LLP, Proskauer Law Firm, Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud.. IViewit is Next. 13 Trillion Dollar Scandal, USPTO, DOJ, SEC, knows of Massive Shareholder Fraud.
"Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey.
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more.
Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey.
Stanford Trial Drags Former Proskauer, Chadbourne Partner Back into Spotlight
Brian Baxter The American Lawyer February 8, 2012
View Article Click Below
http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202541880071&slreturn=1
—–
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more
—
—-
United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit
Justices: Debra Ann Livingston, Richard C. Wesley, Peter W. Hall and- Ralph K. Winter, Jr.
—-
Eliot Ivan Bernstein, Pro Se Plaintiff – Appellant
–v–
Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al. Defendants / Appellees
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
CASE 07 Civ. 11196 (Shira Anne Scheindlin)
LEGALLY Related Case to Iviewit RICO by Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin to:
(07 Civ. 9599) (SAS-AJP) WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT of Christine C. Anderson, Esq. v. the State of New York, et al.
(Anderson, a Former New York Supreme Court Attorney)
Cases Legally Related to Anderson / Iviewit:
1. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
2. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
3. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
4. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
5. Related Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
6. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
7. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
8. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
9. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
10. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
11. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.
12. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.
13. 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
14. 08cv4438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
15. 08 cv 6368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
16. 06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al.
ELIOT IVAN BERNSTEIN, PRO SE
2753 N.W. 34TH STREET BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o) / (561) 886.7628 (c) / (561) 245-8644 (f)
iviewit@iviewit.tv / www.iviewit.tv
Table of Contents
Conflict of Interest (COI) Disclosure Form… 6
Motion to.. 22
I. Introduction.. 23
a. Christine c. Anderson, Esq., new york supreme court attorney Whistleblower Testimony Reveals a Criminal RICO Cartel Coup D’ÉTAT on government at the highest outposts of law and regulation.. 23
b. Meet the coupsters.. 26
c. The Controlled Demolition of World Markets by Attorneys at Law operating as a criminal rico enterprise and infiltrating senior pUBLIC offices, including within the department of justice and the courts.. 39
d. Where is the Justice? THe CRIMINAL role of this court in AIDING AND ABETTING the criminal rico enterprise.. 48
II. IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have currently acted in this Lawsuit in anyway whatsoever, for their part in Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process, HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS and more.. 69
III. Remand, Halt and Rehear this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest, both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel their office and additionally for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit, by Violating Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law 83
IV. Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson’s Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials and more. 92
HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of, the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, Justices of the courts, Officers of the New York Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments, officers of the new york supreme court disciplinary departments and others, based on FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS in US Federal Court and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Felony Crimes alleged by Anderson, directly relate to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, including having several identical New York State Public Official Actor/Defendants and the allegations are wholly germane to the nexus of the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit Crimes alleged. Further the two lawsuits are “Legally Related” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin. 96
V. Remove and report ALL other Conflicts of Interest, violations of public office rules, violations of judicial cannons, attorney conduct codes and state and federal law, currently in place in this RICO Lawsuit and related cases, in order to impart fair and impartial DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW… 96
VI. DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, etc. sign Affirmed Conflict of Interest Disclosures, identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. 97
VII. Demand for Justices of the SECOND CIRCUIT to turn themselves in to State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.. 97
VIII. Alleged crimes ongoing by p. stephen lamont et al. both known and unknown and fraud on this court, the us district court and now other courts including the supreme court and more. 98
IX. PLAINTIFF SEEKS LEAVE TO AMEND THE AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD NEW DEFENDANTS AND NEW ALLEGED CRIMES NEWLY DISCOVERED.. 98
X. Relief.. 99
Exhibit 1 – conflict of interest disclosure PARTIAL LIST OF KNOWN CONFLICTED PARTIES. 100
Exhibit 2. 106
EXHIBIT 3 – Criminal Complaint S. 108
Exhibit 4 – Ethics Complaint. 108
MOTION TO:
· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit by Violating Public Office Rules &; Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law.
· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court’s Attorney Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson’s (“Anderson”) Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials et al.
· HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, New York State Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments and others.
FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS EXPOSED in US Federal District Court, THIS COURT and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee by the HEROIC TESTIMONY and SWORN STATEMENTS of NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY WHISTLEBLOWER, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON.
· IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have acted to this point in this Lawsuit in any capacity whatsoever, for Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process and more.
· Remove ALL other Conflicts of Interest currently in place in this Lawsuit in order to implement FAIR & IMPARTIAL DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW.
· DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, et al. Sign and Affirm Conflict of Interest Disclosures identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.
· Demand for Justices and others named herein of this Court to turn themselves in to the appropriate State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.
——
Caution! if you have not signed the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure form and returned it as instructed and you continue to act in any manner whatsoever in these matters, Criminal Charges will be brought against you, for Obstruction of Justice, Aiding & Abetting a Criminal RICO Organization and More. see the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for further information regarding your potential personal and professional liabilities.
—–
I. Introduction
“What country before ever existed a century &; a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.
The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon &; pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure.”
The “Tree of Liberty” letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Smith http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96oct/obrien/blood.htm
A. NEW YORK SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON, ESQ. (“Anderson”) MAKES FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS IN US FEDERAL COURT AND BEFORE THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SENIOR RANKING OFFICIALS OF THE US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY DEPARTMENTS, “FAVORED LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS” [Footnote 3] and names a “CLEANER” [Footnote 4] , as revealed in federal court testimony, a one Naomi Goldstein.
THESE ALLEGATIONS DEMAND IMMEDIATE REPORTING, INVESTIGATION AND HALTING OF THE LEGALLY RELATED IVIEWIT RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT IN ORDER TO BEGIN INVESTIGATIONS TO IDENTIFY AND PROSECUTE THOSE FINGERED BY WHISTLE BLOWER ANDERSON and OTHERS.
—
[3] From Anderson’s Sworn Statement to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee, “Specifically, I discovered and reported that employees of the DDC had engaged in, inter alia, the “whitewashing” [of] complaints of misconduct leveled against certain “select” attorneys and law firms.
This “whitewashing” sometimes involved burying cases or destroying evidence, so that certain complaints were inevitably, unavoidably, dismissed. I witnessed this destruction of evidence myself. Other reported misconduct involves victimizing attorneys lacking privileged positions or connections.”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=365
[4] “Legal Document: Request for Discovery” Posted on July 22, 2011 by Fred Celani
http://fredcelani.wordpress.com/2011/07/22/request-for-discovery/
—
The “Legally Related” Federal Lawsuit of New York Supreme Court Veteran Senior Supreme Court Disciplinary Department Attorney and Expert in Attorney Criminal Misconduct Complaints, Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq., by Federal Judge Shira Anne Scheindlin to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, exposes from the inside, a legal conspiracy of corruption involving the highest levels of Regulatory, Prosecutorial and Judicial Public Offices both State and Federal. Heroism is a word earned through action. The Whistleblowing Efforts of Anderson, another New York Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower and Hero, Nicole Corrado, Esq., and, a Sitting New York Supreme Court Justice, Honorable Duane A. Hart, Esq., all cited herein, should be the Moniker of HEROISM for others in the legal profession to follow.
These Whistleblowers Expose Corruption at the Top of Government, including the Courts, this Court, the Department of Justice, the New York Attorney General and others.
They further provide the World with an understanding of how America’s Financial System has melted top down, from rigged economic breakdowns and controlled demolition of world markets through fraud, with no Regulators or Prosecutors or Courts to stop it, in fact, all of them Aiding and Abetting the crimes.
Nobody attempting to RECOVER the stolen funds for the PEOPLE, as all of the Top Government Officials charged with enforcement of the Law, appear on the take and part of the crimes according to these Whistleblowers. These Whistleblowing efforts expose how and why no one on Wall Street/Greed Street/Fraud Street has been charged with Criminal Acts, despite massive and overwhelming evidence of CRIMINAL ACTS and FRAUD.
Further exposed, is why none of the Stolen Loot from these Economic Crimes have been recovered back to the People. What is unveiled is a COUP D’ÉTAT on the HIGHEST OUTPOSTS OF LAW & ORDER in the United States and yet not a single story in the Mainstream Media aka US Pravda Press, regarding these shocking allegations by inside Whistleblowers.
Exposed by these HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS is a REVOLVING DOOR between a licentious GROUP OF LAW FIRMS and ATTORNEYS AT LAW, acting in both PRIVATE PRACTICE and PUBLIC OFFICE, working together in CONSPIRACY and forming a RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION with tentacles embedded at the highest outposts of the US Government in order to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE for the CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.
Anderson, Corrado and Other Public Office Whistleblowers cited herein, also provide explanation for why Judges and Attorneys at Law are now desperately trying to grant themselves immunity for felony crimes and attempting to use the State Attorney General Offices and other Government officials as accomplice in the cover-up.
Immunity for ATTORNEYS AT LAW for their role in TORTURE CRIMES, WAR CRIMES and ECONOMIC CRIMES, crimes that include the CREATION OF ILLEGAL/FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL & INSURANCE CONTRACTS that led to the RIGGED HOUSING and MARKET COLLAPSES, that led to MILLIONS OF VERY ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES and left MILLIONS UNEMPLOYED AND STARVING. Seeking immunity for crime, as a legal defense is both futile and an obvious admission of guilt, which will never hold in a fair and impartial court of law?
The attempts to gain immunity for FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS shows culpability in the crimes, exposing fear by the guilty of retribution of the day when the “long arm of the law” swings back.
Fear that they will hang for their crimes against Humanity, their War Crimes (Illegal Undeclared Wars of Aggression, Torture, Misappropriation of Public funds by Congress for Undeclared Wars, Economic Terrorism and more) and they must hope for dirty courts to clear them forever.
Whistleblowing comes at a price to Whistleblowers in this new environment of a CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT.
Christine Anderson, Corrado, Hart and others, including PLAINTIFF have been through hell to bring this INFORMATION TO LIGHT and where this Court should acknowledge Anderson, Corrado and the others who have come forth for their HEROISM, suspiciously, they do not.
These are TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOTS, HEROES and ROLE MODELS OF ETHICS shunned by the very legal system they work in.
We instead find this Court currently attempting to ILLEGALLY DISMISS Anderson’s WHISTLEBLOWER Lawsuit and the “legally related” cases prior to investigations and hearings of the criminal acts exposed by government officials against other Senior Ranking Officials.
We find THIS COURT attempting to BURY THE FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES EXPOSED BY CREDIBLE WITNESSES in a FEDERAL COURT by “SWEEPING THEM UNDER THE RUG,”
PRIOR TO INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED BY LAW, as more fully defined herein. Therefore, Plaintiff starts this Motion in Honor.
A Tip of the Hat to the TRUE PATRIOTS NAMED HEREIN AND THEIR HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS TO BLOW THE LID OFF ONE OF THE LARGEST CORRUPTION STORIES OF ALL TIME, PLACING MEMBERS OF THIS COURT RIGHT IN THE CENTER of world market fraud and more, A ROOT OF THE PROBLEM."
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more.
Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey.
Stanford Trial Drags Former Proskauer, Chadbourne Partner Back into Spotlight
Brian Baxter The American Lawyer February 8, 2012
View Article Click Below
http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202541880071&slreturn=1
—–
Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more
—
IVIEWIT DRAFT MOTION TO SECOND CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS OF CONFLICTS
Case No. 08-4873-CV—-
United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit
Justices: Debra Ann Livingston, Richard C. Wesley, Peter W. Hall and- Ralph K. Winter, Jr.
—-
Eliot Ivan Bernstein, Pro Se Plaintiff – Appellant
–v–
Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al. Defendants / Appellees
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
CASE 07 Civ. 11196 (Shira Anne Scheindlin)
LEGALLY Related Case to Iviewit RICO by Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin to:
(07 Civ. 9599) (SAS-AJP) WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT of Christine C. Anderson, Esq. v. the State of New York, et al.
(Anderson, a Former New York Supreme Court Attorney)
Cases Legally Related to Anderson / Iviewit:
1. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
2. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
3. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
4. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
5. Related Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
6. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
7. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
8. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
9. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
10. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
11. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.
12. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.
13. 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
14. 08cv4438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
15. 08 cv 6368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
16. 06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al.
ELIOT IVAN BERNSTEIN, PRO SE
2753 N.W. 34TH STREET BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o) / (561) 886.7628 (c) / (561) 245-8644 (f)
iviewit@iviewit.tv / www.iviewit.tv
Table of Contents
Conflict of Interest (COI) Disclosure Form… 6
Motion to.. 22
I. Introduction.. 23
a. Christine c. Anderson, Esq., new york supreme court attorney Whistleblower Testimony Reveals a Criminal RICO Cartel Coup D’ÉTAT on government at the highest outposts of law and regulation.. 23
b. Meet the coupsters.. 26
c. The Controlled Demolition of World Markets by Attorneys at Law operating as a criminal rico enterprise and infiltrating senior pUBLIC offices, including within the department of justice and the courts.. 39
d. Where is the Justice? THe CRIMINAL role of this court in AIDING AND ABETTING the criminal rico enterprise.. 48
II. IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have currently acted in this Lawsuit in anyway whatsoever, for their part in Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process, HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS and more.. 69
III. Remand, Halt and Rehear this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest, both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel their office and additionally for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit, by Violating Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law 83
IV. Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson’s Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials and more. 92
HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of, the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, Justices of the courts, Officers of the New York Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments, officers of the new york supreme court disciplinary departments and others, based on FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS in US Federal Court and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Felony Crimes alleged by Anderson, directly relate to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, including having several identical New York State Public Official Actor/Defendants and the allegations are wholly germane to the nexus of the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit Crimes alleged. Further the two lawsuits are “Legally Related” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin. 96
V. Remove and report ALL other Conflicts of Interest, violations of public office rules, violations of judicial cannons, attorney conduct codes and state and federal law, currently in place in this RICO Lawsuit and related cases, in order to impart fair and impartial DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW… 96
VI. DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, etc. sign Affirmed Conflict of Interest Disclosures, identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. 97
VII. Demand for Justices of the SECOND CIRCUIT to turn themselves in to State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.. 97
VIII. Alleged crimes ongoing by p. stephen lamont et al. both known and unknown and fraud on this court, the us district court and now other courts including the supreme court and more. 98
IX. PLAINTIFF SEEKS LEAVE TO AMEND THE AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD NEW DEFENDANTS AND NEW ALLEGED CRIMES NEWLY DISCOVERED.. 98
X. Relief.. 99
Exhibit 1 – conflict of interest disclosure PARTIAL LIST OF KNOWN CONFLICTED PARTIES. 100
Exhibit 2. 106
EXHIBIT 3 – Criminal Complaint S. 108
Exhibit 4 – Ethics Complaint. 108
MOTION TO:
· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit by Violating Public Office Rules &; Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law.
· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court’s Attorney Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson’s (“Anderson”) Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials et al.
· HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, New York State Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments and others.
FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS EXPOSED in US Federal District Court, THIS COURT and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee by the HEROIC TESTIMONY and SWORN STATEMENTS of NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY WHISTLEBLOWER, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON.
· IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have acted to this point in this Lawsuit in any capacity whatsoever, for Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process and more.
· Remove ALL other Conflicts of Interest currently in place in this Lawsuit in order to implement FAIR & IMPARTIAL DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW.
· DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, et al. Sign and Affirm Conflict of Interest Disclosures identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.
· Demand for Justices and others named herein of this Court to turn themselves in to the appropriate State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.
——
Caution! if you have not signed the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure form and returned it as instructed and you continue to act in any manner whatsoever in these matters, Criminal Charges will be brought against you, for Obstruction of Justice, Aiding & Abetting a Criminal RICO Organization and More. see the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for further information regarding your potential personal and professional liabilities.
—–
I. Introduction
“What country before ever existed a century &; a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.
The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon &; pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure.”
The “Tree of Liberty” letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Smith http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96oct/obrien/blood.htm
A. NEW YORK SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON, ESQ. (“Anderson”) MAKES FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS IN US FEDERAL COURT AND BEFORE THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SENIOR RANKING OFFICIALS OF THE US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY DEPARTMENTS, “FAVORED LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS” [Footnote 3] and names a “CLEANER” [Footnote 4] , as revealed in federal court testimony, a one Naomi Goldstein.
THESE ALLEGATIONS DEMAND IMMEDIATE REPORTING, INVESTIGATION AND HALTING OF THE LEGALLY RELATED IVIEWIT RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT IN ORDER TO BEGIN INVESTIGATIONS TO IDENTIFY AND PROSECUTE THOSE FINGERED BY WHISTLE BLOWER ANDERSON and OTHERS.
—
[3] From Anderson’s Sworn Statement to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee, “Specifically, I discovered and reported that employees of the DDC had engaged in, inter alia, the “whitewashing” [of] complaints of misconduct leveled against certain “select” attorneys and law firms.
This “whitewashing” sometimes involved burying cases or destroying evidence, so that certain complaints were inevitably, unavoidably, dismissed. I witnessed this destruction of evidence myself. Other reported misconduct involves victimizing attorneys lacking privileged positions or connections.”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=365
[4] “Legal Document: Request for Discovery” Posted on July 22, 2011 by Fred Celani
http://fredcelani.wordpress.com/2011/07/22/request-for-discovery/
—
The “Legally Related” Federal Lawsuit of New York Supreme Court Veteran Senior Supreme Court Disciplinary Department Attorney and Expert in Attorney Criminal Misconduct Complaints, Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq., by Federal Judge Shira Anne Scheindlin to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, exposes from the inside, a legal conspiracy of corruption involving the highest levels of Regulatory, Prosecutorial and Judicial Public Offices both State and Federal. Heroism is a word earned through action. The Whistleblowing Efforts of Anderson, another New York Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower and Hero, Nicole Corrado, Esq., and, a Sitting New York Supreme Court Justice, Honorable Duane A. Hart, Esq., all cited herein, should be the Moniker of HEROISM for others in the legal profession to follow.
These Whistleblowers Expose Corruption at the Top of Government, including the Courts, this Court, the Department of Justice, the New York Attorney General and others.
They further provide the World with an understanding of how America’s Financial System has melted top down, from rigged economic breakdowns and controlled demolition of world markets through fraud, with no Regulators or Prosecutors or Courts to stop it, in fact, all of them Aiding and Abetting the crimes.
Nobody attempting to RECOVER the stolen funds for the PEOPLE, as all of the Top Government Officials charged with enforcement of the Law, appear on the take and part of the crimes according to these Whistleblowers. These Whistleblowing efforts expose how and why no one on Wall Street/Greed Street/Fraud Street has been charged with Criminal Acts, despite massive and overwhelming evidence of CRIMINAL ACTS and FRAUD.
Further exposed, is why none of the Stolen Loot from these Economic Crimes have been recovered back to the People. What is unveiled is a COUP D’ÉTAT on the HIGHEST OUTPOSTS OF LAW & ORDER in the United States and yet not a single story in the Mainstream Media aka US Pravda Press, regarding these shocking allegations by inside Whistleblowers.
Exposed by these HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS is a REVOLVING DOOR between a licentious GROUP OF LAW FIRMS and ATTORNEYS AT LAW, acting in both PRIVATE PRACTICE and PUBLIC OFFICE, working together in CONSPIRACY and forming a RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION with tentacles embedded at the highest outposts of the US Government in order to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE for the CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.
Anderson, Corrado and Other Public Office Whistleblowers cited herein, also provide explanation for why Judges and Attorneys at Law are now desperately trying to grant themselves immunity for felony crimes and attempting to use the State Attorney General Offices and other Government officials as accomplice in the cover-up.
Immunity for ATTORNEYS AT LAW for their role in TORTURE CRIMES, WAR CRIMES and ECONOMIC CRIMES, crimes that include the CREATION OF ILLEGAL/FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL & INSURANCE CONTRACTS that led to the RIGGED HOUSING and MARKET COLLAPSES, that led to MILLIONS OF VERY ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES and left MILLIONS UNEMPLOYED AND STARVING. Seeking immunity for crime, as a legal defense is both futile and an obvious admission of guilt, which will never hold in a fair and impartial court of law?
The attempts to gain immunity for FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS shows culpability in the crimes, exposing fear by the guilty of retribution of the day when the “long arm of the law” swings back.
Fear that they will hang for their crimes against Humanity, their War Crimes (Illegal Undeclared Wars of Aggression, Torture, Misappropriation of Public funds by Congress for Undeclared Wars, Economic Terrorism and more) and they must hope for dirty courts to clear them forever.
Whistleblowing comes at a price to Whistleblowers in this new environment of a CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT.
Christine Anderson, Corrado, Hart and others, including PLAINTIFF have been through hell to bring this INFORMATION TO LIGHT and where this Court should acknowledge Anderson, Corrado and the others who have come forth for their HEROISM, suspiciously, they do not.
These are TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOTS, HEROES and ROLE MODELS OF ETHICS shunned by the very legal system they work in.
We instead find this Court currently attempting to ILLEGALLY DISMISS Anderson’s WHISTLEBLOWER Lawsuit and the “legally related” cases prior to investigations and hearings of the criminal acts exposed by government officials against other Senior Ranking Officials.
We find THIS COURT attempting to BURY THE FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES EXPOSED BY CREDIBLE WITNESSES in a FEDERAL COURT by “SWEEPING THEM UNDER THE RUG,”
PRIOR TO INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED BY LAW, as more fully defined herein. Therefore, Plaintiff starts this Motion in Honor.
A Tip of the Hat to the TRUE PATRIOTS NAMED HEREIN AND THEIR HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS TO BLOW THE LID OFF ONE OF THE LARGEST CORRUPTION STORIES OF ALL TIME, PLACING MEMBERS OF THIS COURT RIGHT IN THE CENTER of world market fraud and more, A ROOT OF THE PROBLEM."
Source and Full Article
More on the iViewit Story
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Rupert Murdoch and Media Corruption : Did Proskauer Rose Lawyers help Rupert Murdoch to use "Media" to bring you False News?
"Corporate Media, Maybe the Most Destructive Influences in Modern Society."
"Rupert Murdoch and Media Corruption
The endless cesspool which was Rupert Murdoch’s London tabloid News of the World is finished, however the underhanded corporate politics of the master nevertheless hold sway in the U.S. and Britain. Murdoch is definitely the great goule of mass media corruption and consolidation on both sides of the Atlantic.
But he is not a solitary villain. “Murdoch wasn’t the only media beneficiary when the FCC allowed him and others to consolidate their power and influence.” All corporate media are truth thieves.
In the event it can be stated that there is a master of planet wide corporate mass media, that individual is Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch’s News Corporation reigns supreme in television and print media within his native Australia, the United States and the U.k.
United states citizens tend to be most acquainted with News Corporation ownership with the Fox news cable channel, the New York Post, Dow Jones Inc., the Wall Street Journal, and Twentieth Century Fox movie studio and others.
The Murdoch organization isn’t just big, it is known for a specific political mindset. Inspite of the declaration of being “fair and balanced” Fox news along with other Murdoch outlets blatantly encourage and safeguard Right Wing bordering on Fascist interests, politics and Muslim hating propaganda."
"Corporate Media, Maybe the Most Destructive Influences in Modern Society."
Source and Full Article
http://silencednomore.com/rupert-murdoch-media-corruption/
No wonder Proskauer Rose Law Firm was able to cover up a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology theft that makes all video as we know it possible. http://www.deniedpatent.com/ - the Ivewit Technology theft story.
Saturday, December 24, 2011
Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Testimony New York Senate Judiciary regarding the iViewit Case and the stall in the US Courts and USPTO for over a Decade
The biggest story I have written on for years is the iViewit Story. This affects you all.
The Ivieiwit Inventors invented what we all know to be "Video", and they were never given ANY rights to the technology they invented. There are over a 1000 documents online of proof, and the US Court System, USPT, Supreme Court, Department of Justice, SEC and more governing agents continue to stall their JUSTICE. It has been over a decade.
Please Help me Get Justice for the iViewit Inventors and Spread this Story Near and Far, Please Feel Free to Repost anything from my Blogs on iViewit and help me protect the rights of technology inventors and the constitutional rights of us all.
Part One of Eliot Bernstein Testimony on iViewit Technologies
Part Two of Eliot Bernstein Testimony on iViewit Technologies
iViewit SEC Complaint
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
Open Letter To Intel Corp from Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox
http://www.investigativeblogger.com/2011/02/open-letter-to-intel-corp-board-of.html
Open Letter To Warners Bros., AOL, Time Warner Shareholders from Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, Warning them of Massive Undisclosed Shareholder Fraud.
http://www.investigativejournalist.net/2011/02/open-letter-to-time-warner-warner-bros.html
My Blog on Bruce Sewel Apple General Counsel Formerly Intel Corp General Counsel
http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/
My Blog on Intel Corp CEO Paul Otellini
http://www.paulotellini.info/
My Blogs on the Involvement of Foley and Lardner Law Firm in the iViewit Stolen Technology. Keep in Mind Michael Grebe, who groomed Scott Walker and of the Bradley Foundation was the head of Foley and Lardner at the Time and He as said to be Obama's boss while Obama was at Foley and Lardner.
http://www.federalricolawsuit.com/2010/10/foley-and-larder-patent-attorney.html
http://www.foley-lardner.com/
http://www.foley-lardner.com/search?updated-max=2011-03-03T15:06:00-08:00&max-results=20
Greenberg Traurig involved
http://www.greenbergtraurigsucks.com/
Douglas Chey HP, Formerly of Sony, How he was involved
http://www.douglaschey.com/
MPEG LA involved in iViewit Technology Theft
http://www.alexisdevane.com/
John Caulkin Warner Brothers
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/01/letter-from-aol-time-warner-regarding.html
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Proskauer-Rose-Law-Firm-and-Proskauer-Corruption-Proskauer-Sucks/232434523436369?sk=wall&filter=12
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/2010/04/curtis-lu-senior-vice-president-and.html
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CC8QFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fiviewit.tv%2FCompanyDocs%2FJohn%2520Caulkin%2520ltr.12.21.00.doc&ei=QMXjTpmkC4eviQKcyvGzBg&usg=AFQjCNFMGQnFmdzqR4ZqiUrGIDxVmt3Xzw&sig2=dd7LLYbjjwo7f7h-XLUf7g
My Blog on Jeffrey Bewkes Time Warner CEO Regarding iViewit
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/
http://www.proskauerlawfirm.com/
http://www.proskauerfraud.com/
http://www.christophercwheeler.com/
Christopher Wheeler
http://matthewtriggscom.blogspot.com/
Matthew Triggs
http://www.proskauerroseattorney.com/
http://www.alexisdevane.com/
Kenneth Rubenstein and MPEG LA
Raymond Joao
http://raymondjoao.blogspot.com/
Curtis Lu, Formerly General Counsel of Time Warner now General Counsel of Lightsquared
http://www.curtislu.com/2011/02/curtis-lu-senior-vice-president-and.html
http://www.curtislu.com/2011/02/curtis-lu-time-warner-inc-general.html
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2007%2008%20RUBENSTEIN%20KRANE%20JOAO%20MOTION%20FINAL%20BOOKMARKED.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
http://www.eliotbernstein.com/
http://www.massiveshareholderfraud.com/
http://www.josephleccese.com/
http://www.investigativejournalist.net/2011/02/teresa-stanek-rea-deputy-director-of.html
A Few Video Links
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7stLGgBL3Uo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOn4hwemqW0
Kenneth Rubenstein Perjured Deposition
http://www.youtube.com/user/eliotbernstein#grid/user/3BFA906636FA9889
Foley and Lardner Lawyers Taped ..
http://www.youtube.com/user/eliotbernstein#g/c/4068100EE3F8971A
ELLEN on iViewit, ELLEN is said to have invested in iViewit at the Time
http://www.youtube.com/user/eliotbernstein#grid/user/2ADE052D9122F5AD
The Christine Anderson Whistleblower Case,
Whitewashing for Elite Attorneys Connected to iViewit Case
http://www.seconddepartment.com/search/label/Christine%20C.%20Anderson
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=7
http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents_files/Anderson%20111609%20Filing.pdf
http://newyorkcourtcorruption.blogspot.com/2009/12/christine-anderson-v-new-york-state.html
http://www.investigativeblogger.com/search/label/Christine%20Anderson
http://www.judgewhistleblower.com/2011/02/what-is-being-done-about-wall-of.html
http://www.stolentechnology.com/2010/12/criminal-complaint-against-nyag-andrew.html
http://www.federalricolawsuit.com/search/label/Andrew%20Cuomo
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=591
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?tag=andrew-cuomo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pwFlEIp6E
Posted Here by Investigative Journalist / Investigative Blogger
Reporting on iViewit for nearly 3 years now.
Crystal L. Cox
Whistleblower Media
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
The Ivieiwit Inventors invented what we all know to be "Video", and they were never given ANY rights to the technology they invented. There are over a 1000 documents online of proof, and the US Court System, USPT, Supreme Court, Department of Justice, SEC and more governing agents continue to stall their JUSTICE. It has been over a decade.
Please Help me Get Justice for the iViewit Inventors and Spread this Story Near and Far, Please Feel Free to Repost anything from my Blogs on iViewit and help me protect the rights of technology inventors and the constitutional rights of us all.
A Bit on the Iviewit Technology Story.
Part One of Eliot Bernstein Testimony on iViewit Technologies
Part Two of Eliot Bernstein Testimony on iViewit Technologies
More on the iViewit Stolen Technlogy Story
iViewit SEC Complaint
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
Open Letter To Intel Corp from Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox
http://www.investigativeblogger.com/2011/02/open-letter-to-intel-corp-board-of.html
Open Letter To Warners Bros., AOL, Time Warner Shareholders from Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, Warning them of Massive Undisclosed Shareholder Fraud.
http://www.investigativejournalist.net/2011/02/open-letter-to-time-warner-warner-bros.html
My Blog on Bruce Sewel Apple General Counsel Formerly Intel Corp General Counsel
http://intelcorruption.blogspot.com/
My Blog on Intel Corp CEO Paul Otellini
http://www.paulotellini.info/
My Blogs on the Involvement of Foley and Lardner Law Firm in the iViewit Stolen Technology. Keep in Mind Michael Grebe, who groomed Scott Walker and of the Bradley Foundation was the head of Foley and Lardner at the Time and He as said to be Obama's boss while Obama was at Foley and Lardner.
http://www.federalricolawsuit.com/2010/10/foley-and-larder-patent-attorney.html
http://www.foley-lardner.com/
http://www.foley-lardner.com/search?updated-max=2011-03-03T15:06:00-08:00&max-results=20
Greenberg Traurig involved
http://www.greenbergtraurigsucks.com/
Douglas Chey HP, Formerly of Sony, How he was involved
http://www.douglaschey.com/
MPEG LA involved in iViewit Technology Theft
http://www.alexisdevane.com/
John Caulkin Warner Brothers
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/01/letter-from-aol-time-warner-regarding.html
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Proskauer-Rose-Law-Firm-and-Proskauer-Corruption-Proskauer-Sucks/232434523436369?sk=wall&filter=12
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/2010/04/curtis-lu-senior-vice-president-and.html
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CC8QFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fiviewit.tv%2FCompanyDocs%2FJohn%2520Caulkin%2520ltr.12.21.00.doc&ei=QMXjTpmkC4eviQKcyvGzBg&usg=AFQjCNFMGQnFmdzqR4ZqiUrGIDxVmt3Xzw&sig2=dd7LLYbjjwo7f7h-XLUf7g
My Blog on Jeffrey Bewkes Time Warner CEO Regarding iViewit
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/
Proskauer Rose Law Firm involved in iViewit Scandal
http://www.proskauerlawfirm.com/
http://www.proskauerfraud.com/
http://www.christophercwheeler.com/
Christopher Wheeler
http://matthewtriggscom.blogspot.com/
Matthew Triggs
http://www.proskauerroseattorney.com/
http://www.alexisdevane.com/
Kenneth Rubenstein and MPEG LA
Raymond Joao
http://raymondjoao.blogspot.com/
US Patent Office Stalling for over a Decade
Teresa Rea USPTO
Curtis Lu, Formerly General Counsel of Time Warner now General Counsel of Lightsquared
http://www.curtislu.com/2011/02/curtis-lu-senior-vice-president-and.html
http://www.curtislu.com/2011/02/curtis-lu-time-warner-inc-general.html
A Few Documents of Research
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2007%2008%20RUBENSTEIN%20KRANE%20JOAO%20MOTION%20FINAL%20BOOKMARKED.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090213%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20LETTER%20OBAMA%20TO%20ENJOIN%20US%20ATTORNEY%20FINGERED%20ORIGINAL%20MAIL%20l.pdf
Other Research Blogs of Mine Regarding iViewit and More
http://www.eliotbernstein.com/
http://www.massiveshareholderfraud.com/
http://www.josephleccese.com/
http://www.investigativejournalist.net/2011/02/teresa-stanek-rea-deputy-director-of.html
A Few Video Links
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7stLGgBL3Uo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOn4hwemqW0
Kenneth Rubenstein Perjured Deposition
http://www.youtube.com/user/eliotbernstein#grid/user/3BFA906636FA9889
Foley and Lardner Lawyers Taped ..
http://www.youtube.com/user/eliotbernstein#g/c/4068100EE3F8971A
ELLEN on iViewit, ELLEN is said to have invested in iViewit at the Time
http://www.youtube.com/user/eliotbernstein#grid/user/2ADE052D9122F5AD
Iviewit the Fight for the Holy Grail
The Christine Anderson Whistleblower Case,
Whitewashing for Elite Attorneys Connected to iViewit Case
http://www.seconddepartment.com/search/label/Christine%20C.%20Anderson
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=7
http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents_files/Anderson%20111609%20Filing.pdf
http://newyorkcourtcorruption.blogspot.com/2009/12/christine-anderson-v-new-york-state.html
http://www.investigativeblogger.com/search/label/Christine%20Anderson
http://www.judgewhistleblower.com/2011/02/what-is-being-done-about-wall-of.html
Andrew Cuomo New York Involved in Massive Cover up Over iViewit
http://www.stolentechnology.com/2010/12/criminal-complaint-against-nyag-andrew.html
http://www.federalricolawsuit.com/search/label/Andrew%20Cuomo
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=591
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?tag=andrew-cuomo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pwFlEIp6E
Posted Here by Investigative Journalist / Investigative Blogger
Reporting on iViewit for nearly 3 years now.
Crystal L. Cox
Whistleblower Media
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Friday, November 11, 2011
MPEG LA, Greenberg Traurig, Proskauer Rose, Foley and Lardner, Intel Corp, Warner Bros., Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Technolgies, Foley and Lardner, Massive Shareholder Fraud
the Iviewit Technology Story - Proskauer Rose, MPEG LA, Greenberg Traurig
The iViewit Technologies Story involves some of the biggest tech, media, law firms in the world, Click Below for more on the iViewit Technology Story.
http://www.deniedpatent.com/
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
http://www.dougchey.com/
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/
The iViewit Technologies Story involves some of the biggest tech, media, law firms in the world, Click Below for more on the iViewit Technology Story.
http://www.deniedpatent.com/
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf
http://www.dougchey.com/
http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/
Monday, September 26, 2011
Allen Fagin - Proskauer Rose Law Firm Seems to Know of Massive Proskauer Rose Crimes and had Not Disclosed. Allen Fagin Involved in Massive Coverups?
Allen Fagin - Proskauer Rose LLP seems to have known for over a decade, about Massive Fraud that affects Billions on Top of Billions of Investors Money, yet Allen Fagin seems to turn a blind eye in what looks like to me a cover up to protect one of the world's largest law firms, Proskauer Rose LLP.
Allen Fagin has to know that documents exists, the bills, depositions and a whole lot of information exists that seems to prove many Proskauer Rose Attorneys involved in massive fraud against investors, yet Allen Fagin, then Proskauer Rose Chairman, seems to have done NO Due Diligence in actually looking at this massive fraud against the public at largest, not to mention a, what is now worth 13 Trillion Dollar Technology Theft.
I am not asking you to believe me about Allen Fagin of Proskauer Rose Law Firm, I am asking you to read the Overbilling, Listening to Perjured Depositions of Kenneth Rubenstein, read contracts and legal documents and decide for yourself what the facts are. Allen Fagin does not seem to care about the TRUTH in all this and Allen Fagin seems to simply want to silence the investigative blogger keeping the story alive.
Allen Fagin has to know that documents exists, the bills, depositions and a whole lot of information exists that seems to prove many Proskauer Rose Attorneys involved in massive fraud against investors, yet Allen Fagin, then Proskauer Rose Chairman, seems to have done NO Due Diligence in actually looking at this massive fraud against the public at largest, not to mention a, what is now worth 13 Trillion Dollar Technology Theft.
I am not asking you to believe me about Allen Fagin of Proskauer Rose Law Firm, I am asking you to read the Overbilling, Listening to Perjured Depositions of Kenneth Rubenstein, read contracts and legal documents and decide for yourself what the facts are. Allen Fagin does not seem to care about the TRUTH in all this and Allen Fagin seems to simply want to silence the investigative blogger keeping the story alive.
It Seems Proskauer Rose is involved in Massive Shareholder Fraud, a Major Federal RICO Lawsuit, DOJ Complaints, FBI Complaints and yet Michael Bloomberg seems to just love Proskauer Rose Law Firm or at least the money that Proskauer Rose Brings in. See Proskauer Rose controls the New York courts and it would certainly be a bad political move to cross Proskauer Rose.
Proskauer Rose pays massive amounts of money every year for PR, Media, and other marketing yet ex-Chairman Allen Fagin and new Chairman Joseph Leccese did not have the brains to by their dotcom in this day and age so now Proskauer Rose Law Firm is once again proving that Proskauer Rose controls the Internet and that Proskauer Rose will simply take whatever intellectual property that Proskauer Rose wants, no matter who built it, invented it, owns it or what you gave up in your live to build that asset, that intellectual property.
Proskauer Rose Seems to Be Guilty in massive shareholder fraud, money laundering in the madoff and standford cases and many more indescresions, ethics violations, whitewashing for Proskauer Attorneys, controlling the USPTO, controlling the New York and Florida Attorney Bar, Controlling the US Supreme Court, the SEC, the DOJ and more.. .and still for some reason Proskauer Rose "thinks" they are still above the Law and accountable to no one.
Do your Homework on the Massive Corruption, Cover Ups, Whitewashing of Proskauer Rose Law Firm.. if you find sites that go no where and want information, email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com - it will mean that Proskauer Rose convinced WIPO to give them my domain names in conspiracy to cover up massive corruption.
Allen Fagin - Proskauer Rose Corruption Research Links
Read the Documents on Proskauer Rose's, Allen Fagin Involvement in the iViewit Technology Theft and Decide for your self what the Truth is or why Allen Fagin, Proskauer Rose Law Firm seems to be protected by the US Courts in this case and for over a decade.
Read the Documents on Proskauer Rose's, Allen Fagin Involvement in the iViewit Technology Theft and Decide for your self what the Truth is or why Allen Fagin, Proskauer Rose Law Firm seems to be protected by the US Courts in this case and for over a decade.
http://www.investigativeblogger.com/search/label/Proskauer%20Rose%20LLP
Why Does Proskauer Rose Attorney Allen Fagin seems to do nothing to hold Proskauer Rose Attorneys accountable for the illegal behavior that seems to be in mass over the Iviewit Technology Theft?
Allen Fagin can Read I presume and therefore there are over 1200 documents of Proof Posted online that Allen Fagin, Proskauer Rose Attorney could read for details of the liability Allen Fagin faces over the iViewit Scandal, yet instead Allen Fagin Proskauer Rose LLP simply tried to steal the intellectual property of an Investigative Blogger to Silence the Truth about what Allen Fagin Should know over the iViewit Stolen Technology.
If you have a Tip on Allen Fagin, eMail me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Why Does Proskauer Rose Attorney Allen Fagin seems to do nothing to hold Proskauer Rose Attorneys accountable for the illegal behavior that seems to be in mass over the Iviewit Technology Theft?
Allen Fagin can Read I presume and therefore there are over 1200 documents of Proof Posted online that Allen Fagin, Proskauer Rose Attorney could read for details of the liability Allen Fagin faces over the iViewit Scandal, yet instead Allen Fagin Proskauer Rose LLP simply tried to steal the intellectual property of an Investigative Blogger to Silence the Truth about what Allen Fagin Should know over the iViewit Stolen Technology.
If you have a Tip on Allen Fagin, eMail me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com
Sunday, July 17, 2011
Richard G. Lyon Concurs with WIPO Panel but Richard G. Lyon feels he must SLAM Investigative Blogger's Rights and Motives at the Same Time. Richard G. Lyon. Proskauer Rose - Crystal Cox WIPO Dispute
"
Part 1
Part 2
OPINION CONCURRING IN PART AND CONCURRING IN THE DECISION
Though I agree that the Complaint must be denied, I adhere to my oft-stated views that a criticism site even if entirely noncommercial does not confer upon a domain name holder a right or legitimate interest if the domain name consists solely of the complainant’s (and the target of the criticism) mark.
Those interested in the details of my reasoning may read, among other cases, Joseph Dello Russo M.D. v. Michelle Guillaumin, WIPO Case No. D2006-1627 (majority opinion), and Justice for Children v. R neetso / Robert W. O’Steen, WIPO Case No. D2004-0175.
Here the Domain Name and mark at issue do not match exactly, but the only difference exacerbates the likelihood of confusion on the part of Internet users by adding a description of Complainant and the services Complainant provides. On the reasoning of the cases cited above, Respondent should not be permitted to appropriate Complainant’s soapbox for her criticism of Complainant.
Those interested in the details of my reasoning may read, among other cases, Joseph Dello Russo M.D. v. Michelle Guillaumin, WIPO Case No. D2006-1627 (majority opinion), and Justice for Children v. R neetso / Robert W. O’Steen, WIPO Case No. D2004-0175.
Here the Domain Name and mark at issue do not match exactly, but the only difference exacerbates the likelihood of confusion on the part of Internet users by adding a description of Complainant and the services Complainant provides. On the reasoning of the cases cited above, Respondent should not be permitted to appropriate Complainant’s soapbox for her criticism of Complainant.
Resolution of that issue, however, is unnecessary in this proceeding, for in my view the Complaint must be denied on the other ground stated by the Panel.
Complainant and others are battling Respondent and others over a slew of domain names and assorted issues of tort law. The Response in this case lists some (perhaps all?) of the other individuals engaged in these other proceedings.
The Policy itself and Policy precedent do not permit consolidation of these other proceedings under the limited mandate of the Policy; even if consolidation were possible that would do nothing about the charges of defamation (and other torts) and countercharges of harassment (and other torts).
Decisions in this or any of the other Policy proceedings are subject to subsequent challenge in court, where the panels’ findings are not binding. Given the parties’ history, that may well happen here.
Complainant and others are battling Respondent and others over a slew of domain names and assorted issues of tort law. The Response in this case lists some (perhaps all?) of the other individuals engaged in these other proceedings.
The Policy itself and Policy precedent do not permit consolidation of these other proceedings under the limited mandate of the Policy; even if consolidation were possible that would do nothing about the charges of defamation (and other torts) and countercharges of harassment (and other torts).
Decisions in this or any of the other Policy proceedings are subject to subsequent challenge in court, where the panels’ findings are not binding. Given the parties’ history, that may well happen here.
Like the Panel, I think it better that all matters be addressed in a forum that has the jurisdiction and competence to do so than that the Policy be stretched, in a case that is not clearly cyber squatting, merely to give one party or the other an edge in the litigation that will inevitably follow. In these circumstances I stand with the panel in Rudy Rojas v. Gary Davis, WIPO Case No. D2004-1081: “a plague o’ both your houses.”
Richard G. Lyon
Panelist (concurring)
Panelist (concurring)
Date: June 30, 2011"
Source of Proskauer Rose Law Firm WIPO Dispute with Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox
“a plague o’ both your houses.” - Richard G. Lyon Say...
Hey Richard G. Lyon YOU don't get to Plague o' My House. I am not griping, not lying and not even making this stuff UP... I am "Reporting" the TRUE story of a One of the Worlds Largest Law Firms involved in a 13 Trillion Dollar Patent Theft
"Though I agree " Says Richard G. Lyon - WIPO Panel, Still Richard G. Lyon must give me a thrashing and assume my "agenda" and throw in the Two Cents of Richard G. Lyon, to, I suppose make sure Proskauer Rose Stays on Richard G. Lyon's good Side ~ Thing is Richard G. Lyon is talking out his ass pretty much as this is not a Free Speech Issue, this is FACT, this is REAL News about the Criminal Activity of a Major Law Firm Seemingly Protected by the Highest Courts.
Richard G. Lyon needs to read all the documents, billing, reports, legal documents, and listen to perjured depositions and then Richard G. Lyon - WIPO Panelist may want to rethink all this Trash Talk that makes Richard G. Lyon look clueless and makes Richard G. Lyon look in "Conspiracy" with Proskauer Rose Law Firm to Conceal the Truth in a 13 Trillion Dollar Federal RICO Lawsuit.
The "trademark" issue is Gibberish, Bullshit, Illusions and a Scam on the Public at Large as the Registrars Such as Godaddy make really big money selling Trademarks that you the Public end up Losing. Folks Like Proskauer Rose, Realtor, and other Trademarks most often win and before that they Bully Domainers, Domain Name Owners into releasing their domain names out of fear of Lawsuits - such as the National Association of Realtors did to Me, I lost thousands of Dollars in Domain names because I let them go to NAR, though I had built a brand on them and was a Broker Owner, Member of NAR ~
See you the "Public" are not "allowed" to own Trademarked Names, you can't use them to Make Money See.. so Intellectual Property Idiots such as NAR, bully you into letting go of your Domain Names, meanwhile companies lease names with "Realtor" in the Name and other people re-sell Realtor domain names, and yet I as a "Realtor" was not allowed to use the Name.
It is Smoke and mirrors see, as the Registrar such as Godaddy SHOULD have a Copyright Filter and YOU, we .. I should not be able to Purchase a Trademark Name.. but we can and they make money from it.. then we lose the name and they sell it on auction.. meanwhile Idiots like NAR are satisfied as long as you Joe PUBLIC are not using the name for Commercial Use, so you Park the Name at the Registrar where they the DOMAIN Name Registrar, makes millions from those names monthly with adds on the name from Google and Yahoo and other sources, so NAR lets the Registrar make the money but not the Smart, Web Savvy Domainer who had the brains to market and brand the Domain Name in the First Place and they call this FAIR, Impartial .. See WIPO is kind of full of Shit..
If the Registrar can sell the name, then why is the end user punished and then the Registrar gets to make money from adds.. There is a breakdown in the system and the Rich Get Richer and WIPO is NOT Neutral nor does WIPO have to prove to you that there is no Conflict of Interest when they decided the FATE of your Intellectual Property.
As in my case, I never was "allowed" to know why Dawn Osborne of the UK, reclused herself from the WIPO Panel on my case and why did Dawn Osborne do this so late in the complaint process? It was because I pressured them for a Conflict of Interest Disclosure which WIPO says of course the panel is not conflicted, yet hmmmm Proskauer Rose had a Conflict of Interest with Dawn Osborne that was NOT disclosed and I have a right to know what it is YET am denied this right..
SO We have Richard G. Lyon who does "agree" with the Panel, yet NOT.. See the Truth is the WIPO Panel Fears me Exposing the Truth, Fears Lawsuits, and so they just denied the Complaint Based on gibberish that makes no sense, based ON Supposed U.S. Constitutional Rights and Free Speech when the real issue here is conspiracy to hide the TRUTH about a 13 Trillion Dollar Federal RICO Lawsuit and the seeming Fact that the WIPO panel may have been in on this Conspiracy until I exposed this possibility and they bailed.
~~~
The Pompous Ass Richard G. Lyon says that my site are a target of the criticism - well this post is a Target of Criticism and i am critisizing Richard G. Lyon, as the blogs were and are Media exposing a story that exists and are not Targets to Criticize, this is UNFAIR To Say, do you Say this about the New York Times when they "Target" guys like Philip Falcone, or other large media when they write about stories TRUE or NOT .. is this a "target of the criticism " ?
Just because I am not as big as the New York Times or Wall Street Journal does not mean that my stories are rants, gripes or targets of criticism ? These are true stories and ya some of my opinion as an Investigative Blogger VERY educated on the Story.
Richard G. Lyon has no right to say the things he has and Richard G. Lyon is Flat OUT Wrong - Do your Homework, READ, Learn, Think and Make up your Own mind on the iViewit Stolen Technology Case of which should have nothing to do with this supposed "Trademark" issue - YET in fact has everything to do with it..
a bit of a Rant on this Issue.. Oh and 1+1=2 no matter your opinion on How I Look..
Part 1
Part 2
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Joseph Leccese, Proskauer Rose does nothing to "Clean Up" Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Why?
Proskauer Rose has been involved in a major scandal for over a Decade. The FBI, Department of Justice, SEC, Florida Supreme Court, Florida State Bar, New York Supreme Court, New York Bar and more have known about this massive fraud for over a decade.
Now the Solution that Proskauer Rose LLP has come up with in order to STOP the Truth from getting to shareholders and investigators is to take the domain names of an investigative blogger, me ~ Crystal L. Cox. Though I have done nothing but EXPOSE the TRUTH about Proskauer Rose Law Firm.
Proskauer Rose is named in SEC Complaint, what is Joseph Leccese, Proskauer Rose's new "Head Guy" doing to investigate this? The solution seems to be to try and intimidate an investigative blogger to cover up decades of secrets, crimes, scandals and cover ups of Proskauer Rose Law Firm.
When Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose should really take a look at ALL the documents, evidence of the iViewit Technologies Case, as there is proof on top of proof of Proskauer Rose Attorneys involvement and it is without a doubt a major Liability to Proskauer Rose.
There is no way to look at all the evidence against Proskauer Rose in the iViewit Stolen Technology case and to not see that Proskauer Rose attorneys are GUILTY. So why is Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose putting his career on the line as new "Head Guy" to support criminals that are now under his management ???
Taking the Domain Names of an Investigative Blogger will now STOP the Truth. There is too much evidence proving the Real Facts of the Stolen iViewit Technology and the Involvement of Proskauer Rose Law Firm.
Here are Some Links to Educate Joseph Leccese, Head Guy at Proskauer Rose Law Firm on the major liability of Proskauer Rose over the Stolen iViewit Technology, in which Joseph Leccese seems to have been lied about by Proskauer Rose attorneys involved such as Kenneth Rubenstein, Matthew Triggs and former Proskauer Rose Attorney Christopher C. Wheeler.
SEC Complaint Naming Proskauer Rose with Details as to what REALLY Happened
Proskauer Rose Liability information
Kenneth Rubenstein's Perjured Deposition
Proskauer Rose Crime Chart
Gregg Mashberg Knows of Fraud and the Connections to Whistleblower Cases
in High Courts of New York
Proskauer Rose Sued in Trillion Dollar Federal RICO Lawsuit over Iviewit Stolen Technology
Information on this Case related to a major Whistleblower Case out of New York
Proskauer Rose MPEG LA Lawyer Sued Over Patents
Lots of Documents, Videos and Information on the FACTS of the Case, should Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose take a good look at the real risk Proskauer Rose face over this 10 year plus case.
Other Links on Proskauer Rose involved in Major Technology Theft
There are over 1200 Documents Online, and massive prove in many federal agencies, federal courts, state bars and for some reason all are protecting Proskauer Rose Law Firm and NOT protecting the Rights of the United States Inventors which is a Constitutional Right. Proskauer Rose is NOT above the Law unless everyone ignores the blatant evidence that proves that Proskauer Rose did in FACT commit these crime and is liable without a doubt for a 13 Trillion Dollar technology theft.
Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
NYS Office Of The Attorney General - Researching the WIPO, Proskauer Rose Case
Brooklyn, New York, United States
IP Address: Nys Office Of The Attorney General (12.33.45.253) [Label IP Address]
Referring URL: www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2011-0675
Visit Page: www.proskauerlawfirm.com/
Resources to Research NYAG, iViewit Case
NYAG Office Admits Conflict of Interest with Conversation with Eliot Bernstein
May 22nd 2011 YouTube Upload
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)